Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/2011 03:12 PM, Dane Smith wrote: >> profiles/arch/x86/profile.bashrc:if hasq profile ${IUSE} && useq >> profile && \ >> profiles/arch/x86/profile.bashrc: hasq -fomit-frame-pointer ${CFLAGS} >> ${CXXFLAGS} >> sys-libs/glibc/files/eblits/src_install.eblit: local pthread=$(ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/11 07:40, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 07/08/2011 02:16 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 07/08/2011 01:21 AM, Dane Smith wrote: >>> All, >>> In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are >>> "Deprecated". If this is the case, do

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/2011 02:16 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 07/08/2011 01:21 AM, Dane Smith wrote: >> All, >> In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are >> "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to >> have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use'

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq (RFC: eclass/ directory patch)

2011-07-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/2011 01:21 AM, Dane Smith wrote: > All, > In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are > "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to > have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has' > respectively? > > Regards, > I've just

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 01:19 μμ, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:16:02 +0300 > Markos Chandras wrote: >>> Uhm, no. The "make them die" would be done on an EAPI bump, so users >>> won't be affected. >>> >>> You *do* test things before committi

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:16:02 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > > Uhm, no. The "make them die" would be done on an EAPI bump, so users > > won't be affected. > > > > You *do* test things before committing, right? > > I wouldn't expect this answer from yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 12:33 ??, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:20:43 +0300 > Markos Chandras wrote: >> I believe that make them die wont improve anything but instead this >> will bring more frustration to our users. If you make them die you

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: >> And what would be the advantage of removing these functions? They >> have zero maintenance cost (as already stated previously, see >> below). > Making sure people don't use them and through that removing the need > to know what the two functions d

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:20:43 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > I believe that make them die wont improve anything but instead this > will bring more frustration to our users. If you make them die you > transfer the problem to the users, cause you make th

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 12:09 ??, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 8.7.2011 11.55, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote: >> > In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are > "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Petteri Räty
On 8.7.2011 11.55, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote: > In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'us

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote: >> > In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are >> > "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be >> > pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to >> > 'use' and 'has' respectively? >> >> Sounds goo

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:52:36 +0300 Petteri Räty wrote: > On 08.07.2011 01:21, Dane Smith wrote: > > All, > > In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are > > "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be > > pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switc

Re: [gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-07 Thread Petteri Räty
On 08.07.2011 01:21, Dane Smith wrote: > All, > In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are > "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to > have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has' > respectively? > Sounds good. One thing we

[gentoo-dev] useq and hasq -- link

2011-07-07 Thread Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sorry for the extra spam. I was missing the link: [1] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/function-reference/query-functions/index.html - -- Dane Smith (c1pher) Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/loo

[gentoo-dev] useq and hasq

2011-07-07 Thread Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has' respectively? Regards, - -- Dane Smith (c