[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-osx] Package testing -- Automated initiative

2005-08-14 Thread Kito
Adding -dev to CC: in case someone has any meaningful input or has already tackled this problem... On Aug 14, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Grobian wrote: Introduction Recently, once again we were confronted with a package marked as ppc-macos stable, while it didn't compile at all, let

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Stefan Jones
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 23:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: i've already contacted fuzzray about utilizing two packages solar put together (and can be found in portage already): pax-utils: scanelf portage-utils: qfile Thanks for the ideas. I had a quick look at the programs; qfile: This

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 14 August 2005 16:20, Stefan Jones wrote: But you could use ldconfig -p to gain a list of all the libraries, put them in a hash table and then use scanelf. Please don't. FreeBSD's ldconfig is *not* the same and this would mean breaking (again) revdep-rebuild on Gentoo/FreeBSD. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Paul Varner
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 16:32 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Sunday 14 August 2005 16:20, Stefan Jones wrote: But you could use ldconfig -p to gain a list of all the libraries, put them in a hash table and then use scanelf. Please don't. FreeBSD's ldconfig is *not* the same and

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Stefan Jones
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 09:52 -0500, Paul Varner wrote: Please don't. FreeBSD's ldconfig is *not* the same and this would mean breaking (again) revdep-rebuild on Gentoo/FreeBSD. Some of those solutions are definitely not portable. Well all we really need is the same utility to work

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-osx] Package testing -- Automated initiative

2005-08-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:00:19AM -0500, Kito wrote: Adding -dev to CC: in case someone has any meaningful input or has already tackled this problem... We do already have an application capable of doing tinderboxing for packages. It's one of the abilities of Catalyst. So all you would need

[gentoo-dev] Adding arch specific use flags

2005-08-14 Thread Jason Wever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Just a friendly (unless you don't fix them soon) reminder to folks who've added arch specific use flags to the tree recently (i.e. ibm) to make doubly sure that the use flag has been masked on all other architectures than the one you've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Devconference archives

2005-08-14 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Corey Shields wrote: | Archive links for the complete morning and afternoon sessions are at | http://devconference.gentoo.org Thanks Corey! I was unable to sit around all day Friday watching them, so this will be really helpful. Donnie -BEGIN

Re: [gentoo-dev] flat profiles punted (and a note about x86/OpenBSD)

2005-08-14 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: as previously mentioned, i've punted all the flat profiles since the 2005.1 release since it seems like no one is using x86-obsd, can their team (if there is one) please create the proper cascading profiles for those