net-mail/mailman is without an ebuild maintainer and has an open security bug
#129136
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129136
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 07:07 schrieb Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen:
net-mail/mailman is without an ebuild maintainer and has an open security
bug #129136
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129136
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our
profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and
warnings the user about bad CFLAGS.
So far it has worked fairly well, and it has really cut down on the
number of bugs
Patrick McLean posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:50:11 -0400:
For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our
profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and
warnings the user about bad CFLAGS.
So far it has worked fairly
Patrick McLean wrote:
For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our
profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and
warnings the user about bad CFLAGS.
So far it has worked fairly well, and it has really cut down on the
number of bugs that filed by people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
Except you need a way for them to turn it off, and you do not currently
provide one. We can set default flags all we want, but I don't see
filtering 'bad' flags as necessarily our problem. If you want to say:
Hey we have
Patrick McLean wrote:
For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our
profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and
warnings the user about bad CFLAGS.
The broken flags part is useful.
So far it has worked fairly well, and it has really cut down on the
R Hill wrote:
There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just
as many situations where they're actually useful. Aside, I've yet to
hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden.
(course someone will undoubtedly point one out now ;))
How
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
R Hill wrote:
There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just
as many situations where they're actually useful. Aside, I've yet to
hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden.
(course someone will undoubtedly point one
