On Tuesday 05 September 2006 05:38, Luis Medinas wrote:
Now the license problems are fixed and we can ship this on our portage
tree tarballs for our new releases etc...
Err, I think the problem was for binpkg, we could already ship cdrtools on the
portage tree tarballs... ebuilds are GPL2.
--
On Monday 04 September 2006 23:38, Luis Medinas wrote:
Now the license problems are fixed and we can ship this on our portage
tree tarballs for our new releases etc...
there was/is no problem beyond our livecds/binpkgs
-mike
pgp59LxF6Qaup.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 23:00 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top
* Luis Medinas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/09/05 04:38 +0100]:
The package is in the tree and it's asking for testing before i can
remove it from pkg.mask and provide the cdrtools virtual.
Now, cdrkit is in the tree. Furthermore I added
cdrtools-2.01.01a08 to the tree. That's the latest GPLed
* Olivier Crete [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/09/01 16:31 -0400]:
Maybe we should p.mask the versions that contain and un-redistributable
mix of CDDL and GPL code.
Or add a big, blinking warning.
Regards, Lars
--
Lars Weiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-1963258
Gentoo Linux PowerPC: Strategical
Luis Medinas wrote:
Now i know the real story since i've been talking with Debian
Maintainers. So there's isn't anything to say but we are working close
to upstream and they actually offer commit access to maintainers of
another distros. Cdrkit project sounds much more like an open project
Hi,
it's this bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121142
There's no comment by the maintainer for a while. I wrote the patches
that are needed to fix the problem. They work fine as far as i can tell.
So what's wrong wrong here?
I don't want to sell my patches to anyone.
But i'd like
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 15:18, Sven Köhler wrote:
There's no comment by the maintainer for a while. I wrote the patches
that are needed to fix the problem. They work fine as far as i can tell.
Don't feel too bad - I frequently post patches to bugs reported on the same
day and ask for
Roy Marples wrote:
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 15:18, Sven Köhler wrote:
There's no comment by the maintainer for a while. I wrote the patches
that are needed to fix the problem. They work fine as far as i can tell.
Don't feel too bad - I frequently post patches to bugs reported on the same
Dear All,
Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago. It's high time
for the official announcement. This year's Board of Trustees for the
Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13. That was
something we wanted a vote on, in addition to the regular board,
however,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
Dear All,
Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago. It's high time
for the official announcement. This year's Board of Trustees for the
Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13. That was
There's no comment by the maintainer for a while. I wrote the patches
that are needed to fix the problem. They work fine as far as i can tell.
Don't feel too bad - I frequently post patches to bugs reported on the same
day and ask for feedback. Some of which are now over a year old without
Mike Doty wrote:
What vote? I don't remember one.
5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Doty wrote:
What vote? I don't remember one.
5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?
Hmm, wasn't there some sort of question as to whether or not simply
accepting them was valid under current policy? I seem to recall that
somebody
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:08:22 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Mike Doty wrote:
| What vote? I don't remember one.
|
| 5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?
A Debian-style reopen nominations option with a vote would make more
sense...
--
Ciaran
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:08:22 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Mike Doty wrote:
| What vote? I don't remember one.
|
| 5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?
A Debian-style reopen
Joshua Jackson wrote:
This is one of those times where I think we all need to take a step
back and really look at what we are doing. Gleps were designed for a
purpose, and this is not one of them. This is an issue of common
sense.
+1 - this just doesn't make sense.
And damn, bugzilla folks
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:17:54AM -0700, Joshua Jackson wrote:
This is one of those times where I think we all need to take a step
back and really look at what we are doing. Gleps were designed for a
purpose, and this is not one of them. This is an issue of common
sense. We all know or at
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:45:39PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Joshua Jackson wrote:
This is one of those times where I think we all need to take a step
back and really look at what we are doing. Gleps were designed for a
purpose, and this is not one of them. This is an issue of common
sense.
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Doty wrote:
What vote? I don't remember one.
5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?
Hmm, wasn't there some sort of question as to whether or not simply
accepting them was valid under current policy? I
On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just remembered something. Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
declined)?
Yes I did. There are a few things I want to achieve before I leave;
being on the Council would
Anders Hellgren wrote: [Mon Sep 04 2006, 02:23:40AM CDT]
38 (forums folk) -- ?? What's the status here?
glep-0038.txt 1.5 10 months tomk Changed the status from Accepted to Final
Thus, -- IF
Ah, thanks. The index.xml page still listed 38 as SA, and I hadn't
looked at the actual GLEP.
Stephen Bennett wrote: [Mon Sep 04 2006, 05:46:52PM CDT]
42 (critical news) -- Change owner to zmedico?
I had semi-unofficially taken over this one, and updated it with
reference implementations etc. Last I knew it had been submitted to the
council, but I never heard of the outcome. If Zac
Brian Harring wrote: [Mon Sep 04 2006, 01:04:21AM CDT]
33 (eclass restructuring)
You left out the char indicating your intention here; 33 likely will
have to be revisited in light of original intentions for it and how
paludis has implemented their equiv (and no, that's not a potshot).
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:02PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Brian Harring wrote: [Mon Sep 04 2006, 01:04:21AM CDT]
49 (alt package manager 1) -- R (by council; sane API preferred)
50 (alt package manager 2) -- R (by council; sane API preferred)
Might want to clarify the sane API
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 12:24 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
Dear All,
Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago. It's high time
for the official announcement. This year's Board of Trustees for the
Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13. That was
something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just remembered something. Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
declined)?
Yes I did. There are a
Hailing from Pittsburgh, PA, the cognitive science department at
Carnegie Mellon University comes Mike Kelly aka pioto. Already known by
some of us from his excellent work on dynusers[1] during this years
Summer of Code he now comes onboard to put it in the tree and
maintaining it, apart from
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:40:26 -0700
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, If there was such an option, which makes it more
then just a popularity contest, I'd be voting.
Seconded.
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On
* Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just remembered something. Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
declined)?
Yes I did. There are a
Torsten Veller wrote:
* Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just remembered something. Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
declined)?
Yes I did.
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 01:22 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hailing from Pittsburgh, PA, the cognitive science department at
Carnegie Mellon University comes Mike Kelly aka pioto. Already known by
some of us from his excellent work on dynusers[1] during this years
Summer of Code he now comes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hailing from Pittsburgh, PA, the cognitive science department at
Carnegie Mellon University comes Mike Kelly aka pioto. Already known by
some of us from his excellent work on dynusers[1] during this
Heh, a fellow Gentoo dev here in Pittsburgh!
Looks like there's three of us now! :)
Welcome to Gentoo Mike Kelly!
-Joe
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
So yeah, buy him a pint and welcome him onboard!
Welcome!
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 01:22 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hailing from Pittsburgh, PA, the cognitive science department at
Carnegie Mellon University comes Mike Kelly aka pioto. Already known by
some of us from his excellent work on dynusers[1] during this years
Summer of Code he now comes
36 matches
Mail list logo
