-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
some topics off the top of my head:
- unaddressed CoC issues:
- add a mission statement
- fix wording to have a positive spin
- what else ?
- sync Social Contract with Gentoo Foundation statement
Mike Doty wrote:
apparent decline of QA in our packages.
Anyone got numbers for that? Talking opinions, as in the SCM discussion,
isn't real meaningful.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:51:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
some topics off the top of my head:
- unaddressed CoC issues:
- add a mission statement
- fix wording to have a positive spin
- what else ?
We need quite a few more people on the CoC team. One reason being that
Since i tried to get things running for the last week or two, i need
to throw in my 2 cents here.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:51:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
some topics off the top of my head:
- unaddressed CoC issues:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Wernfried Haas wrote:
Since i tried to get things running for the last week or two, i need
to throw in my 2 cents here.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:51:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
-
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:55:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Wernfried Haas wrote:
Since i tried to get things running for the last week or two, i need
to throw in my 2 cents here.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
On Wed,
hello list,
I just subscribed to this list. Let me introduce myself: I'm an italian
Gentoo user (from 3 yrs or so), student in Computer Science Engineering,
occasionally developer.
Sometimes I did some ebuild contributions through bugzilla (with this
email adress).
Today I created a little init
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Wernfried Haas wrote:
I compiled a list of things that i think need to be done such as
defining some general guidelines for work, snip
sorry, due to the thread (things for Council to talk about), i thought the
work you were talking about was stuff for the Council to
federico wrote:
Today I created a little init script in the flavour of hdparm, that is:
a config file (/etc/conf.d/pciparm) to tweak PCI latency parameters.
I don't know if others PCI registers deserve attention (I just use
latency_timer), so I want to submit this to your attention and hear
On Sun, Apr 1, 2007 at 12:32:06 +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1500 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe
Steve Long ha scritto:
What benefits does it show; why would I want it on my machine?
cause you don't want to write setpci stuff in /etc/conf.d/local.start ;D
seriously: because you can disable it by a kernel command line
'nopciparm' (like the hdparm script does); because it provides a
Alexandre Buisse wrote: [Wed Apr 04 2007, 02:36:43PM CDT]
I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be
discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council power,
since it seems there is nothing to this effect in the metastructure
glep.
For what it's worth,
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be
discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council power,
since it seems there is nothing to this effect in the metastructure
glep.
I'm not going to write an essay because I don't have the
Hello gentoo ppl,
As you all probably know, the next bugday is helt next saturnday :-)
So feel free to view the website and stick around in #gentoo-bugs on
freenode. Don't be scared to bug the ops/voices for help if needed,
that's what they're there for :-)
Have a nice bugday all! ;-)
Regards,
Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth, I deliberately wrote the GLEP that way. The
truth of the matter is that the Council has only whatever power the
devs permit, so adding additional restrictions seems like a really bad
idea to me.
grant++
Seriously, if enough devs
All,
Please except my apologies for the strong language in my initial
response to this. I've been informed that Samir is the real deal and
not just a marketing droid.
The things that set me off were:
1. Cross posting the same message to a bunch of different mailing lists
2. The HTML
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
All,
Please except my apologies for the strong language in my initial
response to this. I've been informed that Samir is the real deal and
not just a marketing droid.
Apology not accepted. Your language definitely wasn't strong enough.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
federico wrote:
Steve Long ha scritto:
What benefits does it show; why would I want it on my machine?
because it provides a place to store those settings;
latency timer settings? the coder in me can like that idea, the usr wants to
know so what?
although I don't like wrapping each
On Wed, Apr 4, 2007 at 22:27:45 +0200, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Alexandre Buisse wrote: [Wed Apr 04 2007, 02:36:43PM CDT]
I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be
discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council power,
since it seems there is nothing
19 matches
Mail list logo
