Something I'd like to have to ease the live template implementation
would be a standardized eclass interface for every vcs, right now every
eclass does more or less the same things BUT with slight differences and
obviously with different names.
Now, I'd like to know which interface you'd
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for why it would be more useful than eerror/ewarn without an
argument: it would potentially allow for intelligent context-based
coloring of the * (based on surrounding lines).
Well, this is true and it isn't... In the case of:
ewarn line one
eblank
Benedikt Morbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But speaking about names of options - -A and -B are easier to
remember as -A stands for above and -B for below and grep users
already knew that.
for grep -A means after and
Hi, bit off topic, but there hasn't been much discussion of the OpenRC
progress recently - I just wanted to say a bit thanks to Roy for his
work on this - it's been working well on my vservers for a good few
months now, but I hadn't realised just how fast it was until I converted
my mythtv
Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 16
Jun 2008 08:34:01 -0400:
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for why it would be more useful than eerror/ewarn without an
argument: it would potentially allow for intelligent context-based
coloring of the
Duncan wrote:
Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 16
Jun 2008 08:34:01 -0400:
Well, this is true and it isn't... In the case of:
ewarn line one
eblank
ewarn line two
Obviously it would be the same as ewarn. However, what about here:
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:41:55 -0600:
I am leaning more and more toward the idea of a neutral color for
eblanks, as this would indeed be trivial to code and it would make
output make more sense, especially for
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 14:02 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Срд, 11/06/2008 в 19:45 -0400, Jim Ramsay пишет:
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer something that
doesn't add extra lines to ebuild.
I think I would disagree with you here. I think that having a
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 17:01 +, Duncan wrote:
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:41:55 -0600:
I am leaning more and more toward the idea of a neutral color for
eblanks, as this would indeed be trivial to code and it would
Dear all,
app-text/tetex is currently assigned to tex as maintainer, but, in my
opinion, that's a lie. I have not seen any movement on tetex bugs for a
while.
I have opened a tracker bug (#227443, [1]), if someone feels the
courage of picking it up. I don't have neither the time nor the will to
On N, 2008-06-05 at 17:34 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Łukasz Damentko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will be
open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008).
I wish to nominate Halcy0n, Cardoe and leio.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:57:45 +0200
Alexis Ballier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option is to p.mask and last rite it, breaking mips and s390
trees, leaving them without tex support at all. This would also
leave arm and sh with only ptex as tex support. Thus that is not
really an option
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:16:36 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Wow, impressive.
Actually, you can't be serious...
I am.
GLEP 54 for quite some time now and it works very well.
adds nothing to - and sets usage as is.
I just don't see any
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:16:00 +
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current nominees and the state of their acceptance can
be checked on
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/voting-logs/council-2008-nominees.xml
If there's someone else you would like to nominate or if
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:45:35 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:57:45 +0200
Alexis Ballier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option is to p.mask and last rite it, breaking mips and
s390 trees, leaving them without tex support at all. This would also
leave
15 matches
Mail list logo
