On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:55:06 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would having the ebuild perform locking be unportable or introduce
any undesirable complexity? Does it really need to be so
fine-grained?
It's not particularly tricky, and the lock code can be moved into an
eclass if
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:57:28 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we just treat them like other ebuilds except for the thing
about dependencies? Perhaps more fine-grained attributes could be
added for additional specificity.
Could do, yes, in which case the name should be something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:55:06 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would having the ebuild perform locking be unportable or introduce
any undesirable complexity? Does it really need to be so
fine-grained?
It's not
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:26:22 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To simplify things, how about if we just do a
PROPERTIES=live-src-unpack for now, to indicate exclusive access to
$DISTDIR during src_unpack? Thats a simple and portable baseline
that will be quite useful even without
Zac Medico wrote:
To simplify things, how about if we just do a
PROPERTIES=live-src-unpack for now, to indicate exclusive access to
$DISTDIR during src_unpack? Thats a simple and portable baseline
that will be quite useful even without anything finer grained.
No need for a convoluted and long
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:37:26 -0600
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
To simplify things, how about if we just do a
PROPERTIES=live-src-unpack for now, to indicate exclusive access to
$DISTDIR during src_unpack? Thats a simple and portable baseline
that will be quite
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 07:37:26 Joe Peterson wrote:
You are trying to say it's a 'live' ebuild (i.e. it gets the sources from a
live source) - that's all. The locking issues are a technical detail
No, the locking issues are the whole point. There are other reasons to want
the package
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Please do NOT use out-of-office, vacation or any other auto-responders
on the lists. It's bad list etiquette.
decent vacation mail software ignores mail marked with a 'Precedence:
bulk' header, as mailing list mail usually is (including mails sent by
On 06.08.2008 11:11, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Please do NOT use out-of-office, vacation or any other auto-responders
on the lists. It's bad list etiquette.
decent vacation mail software ignores mail marked with a 'Precedence:
bulk' header, as mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
interaction sometime during the pkg_setup and/or src_unpack phases
(similar to GLEP 52 [1]). This will be
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
interaction sometime during the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
Just to be clear; PROPERTIES is a space separated list of items correct?
I was thinking that it might support the same syntax as RESTRICT,
which includes support for USE conditionals.
Zac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:02:48 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
It might good to add support for a new RESTRICT=live value in
ebuilds. By specifying this value, an ebuild would be able to
indicate that it uses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone,
Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining
new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and
hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose
that voters would be able to vote
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:03:02 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining
new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and
hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose
that voters would be able
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What's wrong with just discussing it until we agree? Why do you think a
compromise is necessary?
I think voting might be an interesting approach. We'll see if anyone
else is interested. I don't know yet. :)
Zac
-BEGIN
2) Continued presence of forcefully retired devs It really baffles me that
some developers are forcefully retired for anti-social behavior, but are
not consequently banned from the places where they display this behavior,
such as our MLs and IRC channels. What good is it to retire developers,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Chrissy Fullam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could be a good precedent without being policy, or dependent upon the
reason for being forcibly removed perhaps. It is quite possible for someone
to find another way to contribute without having developer status, a
That's a bit sad that I announce this as I learnt caml with it, too many
years ago.
Reasons:
Does not build (bug #206138), unmaintained upstream for years, not
very useful nowadays. Use dev-lang/ocaml instead.
Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel
On 14:18 Wed 06 Aug , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
Yay!
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they are the contact for any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008.08.06 22:18, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots
of
channels.
Robin
Can Willikins be joined to:-
On 06-08-2008 14:18:05 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they are the contact
Robin H. Johnson kirjoitti:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-*
On 2008-08-06 23:18, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they are the contact for any problems/troubles.
#gentoo-python
Thanks
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 17:18:05 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
#gentoo-kernel
Thanks to everyone involved.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo
Arch channels? #gentoo-amd64 and #gentoo-amd64-dev would be cool :) i tend
to use jeeves a bit in amd64-dev...
Nathan Sullivan.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Mike Pagano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 17:18:05 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
| Hi folks,
|
| Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
| replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
| channels.
|
| Getting the bot out there
| -
|
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:12:16PM +1000, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
Arch channels? #gentoo-amd64 and #gentoo-amd64-dev would be cool :) i tend
to use jeeves a bit in amd64-dev...
Please have the channel founder or point of contact request it.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer Infra
Robin H. Johnson yazmış:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
Thanks!
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in
Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
I don't think anyone will disagree with this one. The one problem that I
see is that if the ebuild still doesn't have this value in it, portage
will *look* like it has
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
I don't think anyone will disagree with this one. The one problem that I see
is that if the
On 14:18 Wed 06 Aug , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
w
Getting the bot out there
-
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
I don't think anyone will disagree with this one. The one problem that I
see is that if the ebuild
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:18 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that they are the
Zac Medico wrote:
As a substitute for the previously discussed RESTRICT=live value[1],
I'd now like you to consider an equivalent PROPERTIES=live-sources
setting. By specifying PROPERTIES=live-sources, an ebuild will be
able to indicate that it uses src_unpack() to download sources from
some
39 matches
Mail list logo
