Am Montag, den 22.06.2009, 15:18 -0400 schrieb Thomas Anderson:
(This is late because I was traveling and dev-zero is/was on devaway.)
This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd 4th
Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
On Wednesday, 24. June 2009 17:48:38 Doug Goldstein wrote:
I wanted to take this time to encourage everyone who can vote in this
year's council elections. This is your chance to affect the technical
development for Gentoo for the coming year and I encourage you to take
it.
Cardoe said it very
Hi,
Here I come again with another gsoc update. Nearly weekly (10 days) but
still better than nothing ;)
Last time, I was talking about an ebuild for packagekit soon. Actually,
packagekit is not useful without a pretty frontend. I am using
gnome-packagekit but packagekit and gnome-packagekit
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:20:09 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Allowing him to proxy in a council meeting is both disallowed
(non-gentoo devs cannot be on the council)
Please point to the rule that says that a non-developer cannot be on
the Council, and please point to the rule
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Wulf C. Krueger w...@mailstation.de wrote:
between both. This strengthening bridge of understanding can be seen in dev-
zero's move to appoint ciaranm as his proxy for today's council meeting.
Sorry to rain on your parade, but with
Hi all,
As a user, I'd like to encourage developers to make use of news items
(eselect news) for important changes. I find them much more noticeable
than elog messages (which, while I have set them up so they get emailed
to me, I admit I don't always read). I think they're also easier to go
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org posted 4a43e30e.4090...@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:50:22 +1200:
I realise that ciaranm has had a nasty past. But recently I haven't see
anything. I for one hope that this continues and that other members of
the community take a look
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ulrich Muelleru...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
it was brought up by ulm that the news item
'2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it
contains a dot.
I stumbled upon this when I experimented with
