Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-12 Thread Markos Chandras
I will take care of x11-wm/openbox app-admin/makepasswd ( with Michael (xmw) Weber as proxy ) app-backup/rsnapshot - Proxy maintainer please contact me Thanks On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: I guess I should have done a proper grep on the tree before my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-12 Thread Alex Alexander
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:50:38PM +0200, Ben de Groot wrote: I guess I should have done a proper grep on the tree before my first message. I missed a few more that are now up for grabs: app-misc/vifm media-sound/ncmpcpp net-misc/wput ^^ I'll take these media-video/smplayer ^^ The Qt team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/traits: traits-3.4.0.ebuild

2010-06-12 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:25:48 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: If a change in EAPI doesn't require any other changes in ebuild, then it's a trivial change. Trivial is when you fix spelling in text sent to stdout/stderr or change the text of a comment. Any

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-12 Thread Petteri Räty
On 06/05/2010 03:41 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: On Saturday 05 of June 2010 02:00:02 Torsten Veller wrote: Hello fellow developers and users. Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). All nominations must be sent to the

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/amrita

2010-06-12 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (12 Jun 2010) # Abandoned by upstream, no releases since 2003. Test suite fails and # generates many deprecation warnings. # Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/amrita signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-12 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:42:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: perl_ldap is feature-ful but hard to use. The bind options are confusing (user / recruiters / infra) do I bind as myself? As anon? Do I specify -b user or -b antarus? Mutli-valued attributes are confusing for users. We should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-12 Thread Mark Loeser
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org said: On Saturday 05 of June 2010 02:00:02 Torsten Veller wrote: Hello fellow developers and users. Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). All nominations must be sent to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Saturday 12 June 2010 23:22:09 Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:42:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: perl_ldap is feature-ful but hard to use. The bind options are confusing (user / recruiters / infra) do I bind as myself? As anon? Do I specify -b user or -b antarus?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name when becoming devaway

2010-06-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
2010/6/10 Pacho Ramos: El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 12:23 -0600, Joe Peterson escribió: I think a better solution, if we need to indicate this, is to have bugzilla grab the status from devaway and display it next to the dev's name in bug reports.  Changing the user's name seems a bit cumbersome,

[gentoo-dev] FW: [Bug 150091] app-forensics/samhain ebuild issues

2010-06-12 Thread schism
Why was a valid package removed for an errant comment in the ebuild? It's not dead upstream, and someone (me) took the time to actually look at it and note that the issue was at least mostly addressed, except for the comment. Then again, what's one more in my overlay of 54 packages, most of which

Re: [gentoo-dev] FW: [Bug 150091] app-forensics/samhain ebuild issues

2010-06-12 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:39 PM, sch...@subverted.org wrote: Why was a valid package removed for an errant comment in the ebuild? It's not dead upstream, and someone (me) took the time to actually look at it and note that the issue was at least mostly addressed, except for the comment. I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] FW: [Bug 150091] app-forensics/samhain ebuild issues

2010-06-12 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On 06/12/2010 10:39 PM, sch...@subverted.org wrote: Why was a valid package removed for an errant comment in the ebuild? It's not dead upstream, and someone (me) took the time to actually look at it and note that the issue was at least mostly addressed, except for the comment. Hi. Most

Re: [gentoo-dev] FW: [Bug 150091] app-forensics/samhain ebuild issues

2010-06-12 Thread schism
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:04:26PM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Shortage of man power will do this, especially for maintainer-needed packages. It was not my intent to personally offend you regarding this package. I know no personal offense was intended, nor was any taken. There should be a