Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-utils.eclass: punt unnecessary .la files even w/ USE=static-libs.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:10:49 -0500 Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: On 23:58 Mon 12 Sep , Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:00:20 -0500 Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: local f for f in $(find ${D} -type f -name '*.la'); do

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wireshark-1.4.4

2011-09-13 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/09/2011 09:55 μμ, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: pva 11/09/12 18:55:52 Modified: ChangeLog Added: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild Removed: wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wireshark-1.4.4

2011-09-13 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mar, 13/09/2011 alle 11.42 +0300, Markos Chandras ha scritto: Why is wireshark blocking itself on DEPEND? is this a known bug that prevents normal update from old to new version? It is a bit odd to have to remove the existing installation in order to update to a new one AFAICT it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wireshark-1

2011-09-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:23:18 +0200 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org wrote: Il giorno mar, 13/09/2011 alle 11.42 +0300, Markos Chandras ha scritto: Why is wireshark blocking itself on DEPEND? is this a known bug that prevents normal update from old to new version? It is a bit odd to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wireshark-1

2011-09-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2011/9/13 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org: On 12/09/2011 09:55 μμ, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: pva         11/09/12 18:55:52 Modified:             ChangeLog Added: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild Removed: wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wireshark-1

2011-09-13 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mar, 13/09/2011 alle 10.28 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: In that case blocking just old versions is wrong, since if your installed version is broken and you try to reinstall, you'll need to uninstall first too. It doesn't matter as much when it's the same version because then it

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
Such checks are used at least in autotools-utils kde* eclasses, and are done wrong there. Thus, I've created a little reusable snippet suitable for eutils. --- eclass/eutils.eclass | 15 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse Ideas for a better name will be appreciated. +# @USAGE: flag Ah, this should've been 'flag'; fixed already. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wiresha

2011-09-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:53:28 +0200 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org wrote: Il giorno mar, 13/09/2011 alle 10.28 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: In that case blocking just old versions is wrong, since if your installed version is broken and you try to reinstall, you'll need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Such checks are used at least in autotools-utils kde* eclasses, and are done wrong there. Thus, I've created a little reusable snippet suitable for eutils. Are you sure this is defined behaviour? IUSE is a fancy merged

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 09/13/2011 06:29, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse Ideas for a better name will be appreciated. 'in_iuse' or 'iuse_contains'? if $(in_iuse foobar); do $(cake) fi or if $(iuse_contains

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:39:13 -0400 Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/13/2011 06:29, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse Ideas for a better name will be appreciated. 'in_iuse' or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:32:40 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Such checks are used at least in autotools-utils kde* eclasses, and are done wrong there. Thus, I've created a little reusable

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:50:30 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Are you sure this is defined behaviour? IUSE is a fancy merged variable for eclasses, and I don't think we guarantee that the value visible to the ebuild at any particular point is the generated value used by the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 09/13/2011 06:46, Michał Górny wrote: Guess just a typo but for the record: No, just a Portal joke :) -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org 4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28 The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment,

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Michal Hrusecky
Hi, please take a look at attached eclasses. Purpose is to make installation of obs services (plugins for osc) easier. Comments and improvements are welcome. Regards -- Michal Hrusecky mi...@gentoo.org # Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Hi, Excerpts from Michal Hrusecky's message of 2011-09-13 13:11:28 +0200: Comments and improvements are welcome. Just some minor remarks: [[ -z ${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} ]] || OBS_PROJECT=openSUSE:${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} [[ -n ${OBS_PROJECT} ]] || die OBS_PROJECT not set! [[ -n ${OBS_PACKAGE}

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: xdtv, video-entropyd, qutecom, vdr-pvr350, SDLcam, vdr-avards, vdr-atmo, and gnomeradio

2011-09-13 Thread Samuli Suominen
https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=359595hide_resolved=1 With these masked, only media-video/lives and old version of libdc1394 remain. That we know of. Old version of libdc1394 is still in tree for ptlib, and it's optional feature, thus not really an issue -- will remove the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 09/13/2011 07:24, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: Hi, Excerpts from Michal Hrusecky's message of 2011-09-13 13:11:28 +0200: Comments and improvements are welcome. Just some minor remarks: [[ -z ${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} ]] || OBS_PROJECT=openSUSE:${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} [[ -n ${OBS_PROJECT} ]]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Excerpts from Joshua Kinard's message of 2011-09-13 14:26:02 +0200: You don't need -n/-z with [[. [[ $var ]] == [[ -n $var ]] [[ ! $var ]] == [[ -z $var ]] What about other comparisons, like -f, -e, or -d? Same as inside [, but no need of quotes inside [[. Also, is this a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:02:43 +0200 Amadeusz Żołnowski aide...@gentoo.org wrote: OT: When I was going through recruitment process, dberkholz pointed to me that I use things bash4-only. And again: why we need to stick to ancient 3 version? I would understand pseudo POSIX compatibility, but what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wiresha

2011-09-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 06:24:51 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:53:28 +0200 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno mar, 13/09/2011 alle 10.28 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: In that case blocking just old versions is wrong, since if your installed version is broken

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.2.ebuild ChangeLog wireshark-1.4.9.ebuild wireshark-1.4.7.ebuild wireshark-1.6.0_rc1.ebuild wiresha

2011-09-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 05:53:28 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno mar, 13/09/2011 alle 10.28 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: (Incidentally, there's a bug in libtool that causes it to randomly link to stuff on / if you try to create an executable that links to both a built

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 06:39 Tue 13 Sep , Joshua Kinard wrote: On 09/13/2011 06:29, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse Ideas for a better name will be appreciated. 'in_iuse' or 'iuse_contains'? I'd prefer to

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 3/9] For .la removal, look for static archives rather than USE=static-libs.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 25 + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index 31d228b..ab8650f 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 2/9] Strip ${D} from removal message to shorten it.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index 8bc365d..31d228b 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 1/9] Fix handling whitespace in filenames when looking for .la files.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index ad5ffea..8bc365d 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 5/9] Check command-line args completely in remove_libtool_files().

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 13 - 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index fd644bb..84f6cb6 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@ -144,6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 4/9] Clean up simplify la removal code a little.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 11 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index ab8650f..fd644bb 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@ -149,21

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 7/9] Drop 'empty' .la files as well (those lacking libs flags).

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 22 -- 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index 48b39cb..9d7e134 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 8/9] Remove static libs covered by .pc files as well.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index 9d7e134..2e01dcc 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@ -156,6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 9/9] Explain .la removal reasons in output.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index 2e01dcc..495244b 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@ -186,16

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 6/9] Refactor remove_libtool_files() to simplify conditions.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/autotools-utils.eclass | 18 ++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass index 84f6cb6..48b39cb 100644 --- a/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/autotools-utils.eclass @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce has_iuse() for IUSE checks.

2011-09-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 06:46:33 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:50:30 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: Are you sure this is defined behaviour? IUSE is a fancy merged variable for eclasses, and I don't think we guarantee that the value visible to the ebuild at any

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Michal Hrusecky
Amadeusz Żołnowski - 13:24 13.09.11 wrote: Hi, Excerpts from Michal Hrusecky's message of 2011-09-13 13:11:28 +0200: Comments and improvements are welcome. Just some minor remarks: [[ -z ${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} ]] || OBS_PROJECT=openSUSE:${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} [[ -n ${OBS_PROJECT} ]]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:02 Tue 13 Sep , Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Kinard's message of 2011-09-13 14:26:02 +0200: You don't need -n/-z with [[. [[ $var ]] == [[ -n $var ]] [[ ! $var ]] == [[ -z $var ]] What about other comparisons, like -f, -e, or -d? Same as inside

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 13:11 Tue 13 Sep , Michal Hrusecky wrote: # Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ # @ECLASS: obs-download.eclass Are there going to be lots of packages using this and not the other eclass? I wonder

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 1/9] Fix handling whitespace in filenames when looking for .la files.

2011-09-13 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
2011/9/13 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org: ---  eclass/autotools-utils.eclass |    2 +-  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) I don't think sending 9 patches is very useful for this mailing list. Next time just sent a link to a git repo or something? Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: HOMEPAGE=http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSC; LICENSE=GPL-2 SLOT=0 IUSE= RDEPEND+=dev-util/osc You probably want a space here. RDEPEND+= dev-util/osc Slightly bike-sheddy, but it's less error-prone to use:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 09/13/11 16:44, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 15:02 Tue 13 Sep , Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Kinard's message of 2011-09-13 14:26:02 +0200: You don't need -n/-z with [[. [[ $var ]] == [[ -n $var ]] [[ ! $var ]] == [[ -z $var ]] What about other comparisons, like

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 1/9] Fix handling whitespace in filenames when looking for .la files.

2011-09-13 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: 2011/9/13 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org: ---  eclass/autotools-utils.eclass |    2 +-  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) I don't think sending 9 patches is very useful for this mailing list. Next time

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 17:58 Tue 13 Sep , Patrick Lauer wrote: On 09/13/11 16:44, Donnie Berkholz wrote: It's because people want to pretend that it's possible for incredibly outdated systems (those with bash-3 only) to be updated. Actually it's worse - PMS enforces this, and the only clean way out is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have a great precedent. Quoting PMS: The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2 in November 2009 (see http://www.gentoo.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2011/9/13 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have a great precedent. Quoting PMS: The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2 in November 2009 (see

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Excerpts from Ulrich Mueller's message of 2011-09-13 19:25:59 +0200: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have a great precedent. Quoting PMS: The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:25:59 +0200 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have a great precedent. Quoting PMS: The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due stefaan retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due stefaan retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: media-libs/libdc1394 media-video/coriander net-misc/ng-utils Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due stefaan retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 09/13/2011 08:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due stefaan retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: media-libs/libdc1394 media-video will take this, i'm working on the single remaining open bug it has as we speak, as part of the = linux-headers-2.6.38 effort thanks - Samuli

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due tanderson retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due tanderson retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-libs/check dev-libs/stfl net-libs/udns Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH autotools-utils 1/9] Fix handling whitespace in filenames when looking for .la files.

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:13:11 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: 2011/9/13 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org: ---  eclass/autotools-utils.eclass |    2 +-  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) I don't think sending 9 patches is very useful for this mailing list. Next

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote: The current situation is that you can't even install bash-3.2 systemwide because of the number of packages [ebuilds/eclasses] requiring on bash-4. Have you filed bug reports for these? Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due tanderson retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Tim Harder
On 2011-09-13 Tue 11:31, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due tanderson retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-libs/stfl I'll take this since newsbeuter depends on it. Tim pgpx5yj9g9A9m.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:40:12 +0200 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote: The current situation is that you can't even install bash-3.2 systemwide because of the number of packages [ebuilds/eclasses] requiring on bash-4. Have you filed bug

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due arfrever retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due arfrever retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-util/global net-irc/kvirc net-libs/neon net-libs/serf net-misc/cadaver Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due tanderson retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 08:31:33PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due tanderson retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-libs/check dev-libs/stfl net-libs/udns Thanks for taking them I'll take dev-libs/check. -- binki Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes!

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due ayoy retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due ayoy retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-vcs/git-sh sci-libs/getdata Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cbrannon retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due cbrannon retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-db/unixODBC net-misc/telnet-bsd Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cbrannon retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 13.09.11 um 21:24 Uhr: Due cbrannon retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: net-misc/telnet-bsd I will take that one. -Marc -- 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 pgpYVzqWJeeUl.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due ayoy retirement

2011-09-13 Thread justin
On 9/13/11 9:17 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due ayoy retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-vcs/git-sh I take this. sci-libs/getdata sci takes this Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cbrannon retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Due cbrannon retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-db/unixODBC I'll take dev-db/unixODBC Thanks, net-misc/telnet-bsd Thanks for taking them -- Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cbrannon retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 09/13/2011 03:24 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due cbrannon retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-db/unixODBC I've use this and don't want to see it rot. If no one wants it, I'll give it love. I have no strong feelings about maintaining it, so if someone else wants to,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cbrannon retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/13/2011 03:24 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due cbrannon retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-db/unixODBC I've use this and don't want to see it rot.  If no one wants it, I'll give it love.  

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cbrannon retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 09/13/2011 11:39 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 09/13/2011 03:24 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due cbrannon retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-db/unixODBC I've use this and don't want to see it rot. If no one wants it, I'll give it love. I have no strong feelings

[gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
i keep writing little helpers like this in ebuilds: usex() { use $1 echo ${2:-yes} || echo ${3:-no} ; } this is so i can do: export some_var=$(usex some_flag) and get it set to yes or no or if i want something a little different, i can do: export some_var=$(usex some_flag true

Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: i keep writing little helpers like this in ebuilds: usex() { use $1 echo ${2:-yes} || echo ${3:-no} ; } usex...you naughty boy. this is so i can do:        export some_var=$(usex some_flag) and get it set to yes or

Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 06:13:10PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 18:01:25 Alec Warner wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: this is so i can do: export some_var=$(usex some_flag) and get it set to yes or no If the intent

Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 17:56 Tue 13 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote: useful enough for EAPI ? or should i just stick it into eutils.eclass ? OR BOTH !? I prefer to avoid EAPI whenever possible, as it just makes things slower and more complex. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Council Member / Sr. Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:02:28PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 17:56 Tue 13 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote: useful enough for EAPI ? or should i just stick it into eutils.eclass ? OR BOTH !? I prefer to avoid EAPI whenever possible, as it just makes things slower and more

Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 19:08:09 Brian Harring wrote: Making it overridable seems wiser- usex() { local flag=$1 local tval=${2-yes} local fval=${3-no} if use $flag; then echo ${tval} else echo ${fval} fi } i dont

Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 22:02:28 Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 17:56 Tue 13 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote: useful enough for EAPI ? or should i just stick it into eutils.eclass ? OR BOTH !? I prefer to avoid EAPI whenever possible, as it just makes things slower and more complex.

Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper

2011-09-13 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:45:27PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 19:08:09 Brian Harring wrote: Making it overridable seems wiser- usex() { local flag=$1 local tval=${2-yes} local fval=${3-no} if use $flag; then echo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses

2011-09-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:41:00 -0500 Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have a great precedent. Quoting PMS: The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2 in November 2009 (see http://www.gentoo.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] proj/portage:master commit in: bin/

2011-09-13 Thread Zac Medico
On 09/12/2011 09:38 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:20:35AM +, Zac Medico wrote: commit: 677240f7b3db66bdcd403c214e5d3fa30e31a24a Author: Zac Medico zmedico AT gentoo DOT org AuthorDate: Tue Sep 13 03:20:00 2011 + Commit: Zac Medico zmedico AT gentoo

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] proj/portage:master commit in: bin/

2011-09-13 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:38:35AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:20:35AM +, Zac Medico wrote: commit: 677240f7b3db66bdcd403c214e5d3fa30e31a24a Author: Zac Medico zmedico AT gentoo DOT org AuthorDate: Tue Sep 13 03:20:00 2011 + Commit: Zac