[gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-filter/dk-milter mail-filter/dkim-milter

2012-04-10 Thread Eray Aslan
# Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org (10 Apr 2012) # Dead upstream. Use mail-filter/opendkim instead. # Removal in 30 days - bug 411429 mail-filter/dkim-milter # Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org (10 Apr 2012) # Dead standard. Dead upstream. # Use mail-filter/opendkim instead. # Removal in 30 days - bug 411427

[gentoo-dev] About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles

2012-04-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
Currently gnome profiles enable automatically gtk USE flag and, then, most gtk based GUIs are installed by default on systems using that profile. A special situation occurs when the package is based in wxGTK as explained in: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411053 Currently, packages like

Re: [gentoo-dev] About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles

2012-04-10 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Other option would be to enable wxwidgets by default for that profiles. I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way (to let gtk mean wxwidgets) would seem frustrating to me. With wxwidgets enabled by default people will get the

[gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
All, I have updated pybugz- to work with the xmlrpc interface of bugzilla. I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we can't do anything about: - you can't add keywords to a bug with the post command, but you can with the modify command. - you can't search on cc: or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:04:22PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: New udev and separate /usr partition Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported configuration. If it is, newer udev can

[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409). -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.15 for unstable

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
once glibc-2.14 starts stabilizing, i'll be moving 2.15 into unstable -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are we allowed to provide valid SRC_URI for fetch restricted packages?

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 26 February 2012 06:34:13 Kacper Kowalik wrote: I've been asked by a user to remove valid SRC_URI for a package that has RESTRICT=fetch. The package in question requires you to go to upstream's webpage, sign license agreement and then you're fed with download link. User argues that

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409). -mike I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 -- Agostino

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are we allowed to provide valid SRC_URI for fetch restricted packages?

2012-04-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: i don't see a problem here.  although this is something that you'd prob want to post to the trustees and let them make a decision. -mike This is a bit of a stale thread. This particular package was modified to remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo CJK team empty, or anyone knows about ibus?

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 02 April 2012 22:29:47 Naohiro Aota wrote: Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org writes: Will CC cjk team then to let them know you are interested to join (looks like there are four devs in cjk alias...) Any updates on this? I didn't notice him been working to return dev, I sent

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:44:05 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409).

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:51:33 Mike Frysinger wrote: not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed in latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. I mean, no need to open a new bug, just continue in that security bug, because the fixed version has never had stable keyword. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles

2012-04-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 10-04-2012 a las 09:12 +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. escribió: On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Other option would be to enable wxwidgets by default for that profiles. I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way (to let gtk mean wxwidgets) would seem

Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 4/10/12 7:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote: I have updated pybugz- to work with the xmlrpc interface of bugzilla. Cool, thank you for working on that. I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we can't do anything about: - you can't search on cc: or keywords fields.

Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:45:14PM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 4/10/12 7:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote: I have updated pybugz- to work with the xmlrpc interface of bugzilla. Cool, thank you for working on that. I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread Steven J Long
Zac Medico wrote: On 04/09/2012 11:09 AM, Steven J Long wrote: One thing that has bothered me with the mooting of an initramfs as the new rescue system that rootfs has traditionally been, is at the we are told at the same time that the initramfs can be very minimal. If so, how does it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 04/10/2012 07:28 PM, Steven J Long wrote: I suppose you could script that, but again, it just seems like a lot of bother to implement an alternative that doesn't actually gain anything over the traditional setup (plus making sure that partitions are mounted before udev starts.) At least in

Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: Here is the documentation for their search command [1]. It would probably be better for us to open a bug against bugzilla itself and request those changes be put in the api. I did some digging on Bugzilla's Bugzilla.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:09:03PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: On 04/10/2012 07:28 PM, Steven J Long wrote: I suppose you could script that, but again, it just seems like a lot of bother to implement an alternative that doesn't actually gain anything over the traditional setup (plus making