Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs

2013-03-09 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:30:10 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:25:23 +0100 Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:49:48 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm afraid that's the first potential point of failure. Relying

[gentoo-dev] About lastriting sys-fs/device-mapper, is that doable?

2013-03-09 Thread Samuli Suominen
Am I right to think we can finally let sys-fs/device-mapper go? Everything up-to-date is already forcing up-to-date sys-fs/lvm2 where the up-to-date device-mapper lives.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs

2013-03-09 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:44:16 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Alexis Ballier schrieb: On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: I dont have a list of binaries, i either noticed myself some abi-specific behaviour or got user reports for