On 13 August 2013 10:51, heroxbd hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear Fellows,
Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
in parallel to Android to drive the external HDMI output with X11
protocal, so
# Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org (16 Aug 2013)
# Getting more broken every day. No commit for 5 years. Nothing
# in the tree uses it. Please consider dev-python/pygpgme instead.
# Bug #339409. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/pyme
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
If upstream doesn't support something it's not a regression. This
upstream removes features all the time in the name of progress. Either
get on the train or get run over by it. If /usr isn't mounted at boot
On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Re , William Hubbs said:
All,
This message is an announcement and a reminder.
OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
days.
If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies:
remember
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Re , William Hubbs said:
All,
This message is an announcement and a reminder.
OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few
days.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
lost their net configs
So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
And hence the value of having a group of volunteer guinea pigs
(anybody
* Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org [130816 10:43]:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people
lost their net configs
So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
And hence the value of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/08/13 10:57 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
* Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org [130816 10:43]:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few
people lost their
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. There are details in
Hello,
gtk is a global use flag [1], gtk2 and gtk3 are used in metadata.xml [2].
Is there a consensus how to use these flags if an app provides gtk2
and gtk3 gui in parallel or exclusive?
Michael
[1] /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc
gtk - Add support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit)
[2]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493
gtk2 and gtk3 useflags are discouraged and should only be used in
special cases
file a bug for those if there is not one already
On 08/16/2013 07:12 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Hello,
gtk is a global
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please let the python herd review distutils-r1 conversions until you
feel safe about it.
On 08/16/2013 11:54 AM, Manuel Rueger (mrueg) wrote:
Index: synaptiks-0.8.1-r3.ebuild
===
On 17 August 2013 01:12, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
gtk is a global use flag [1], gtk2 and gtk3 are used in metadata.xml [2].
Is there a consensus how to use these flags if an app provides gtk2
and gtk3 gui in parallel or exclusive?
Michael
[1]
# Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org (16 Aug 2013)
# Outdated documentation as ruby18 will be removed.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/programming-ruby
Kind regards,
Manuel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Ben de Groot wrote:
As mentioned on IRC, there's this:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gnome_Team_Policies#gtk3
Does this reflect usage of the flags in the tree? Looking at the list
in the original posting, the most common pattern seems to be USE=gtk
to enable GTK+, and
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
handbook as a result.
For regular users, who won't be up to developer standards, maybe the
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
Also, it really isn't Gentoo-specific, but putting /etc in a git repo
is a really good practice, and I'm wondering if it should go in the
handbook as a result.
For regular users, who won't be up to developer
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
Doug Goldstein wrote:
sys-apps/etckeeper is what you want. Works great. It even has portage
integration. Though I'd recommend going with the ~arch version instead
of stable for that portion.
--
Doug Goldstein
I think this is something dispatch-conf does too. I use that but still
make a
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:56:42 +0200
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't build glibc with -O3. Other libc's should either not use -O3 or
use -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns where applicable.
On certain arches the memcpy tranformation happens even on lower
optimization levels
20 matches
Mail list logo
