On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:12:00 +1300
Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 October 2013 08:51, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
I agree, but I think the problem is basically that many people
consider it impossible for newer to ever be shitty.
Even if they are intimately familiar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2013 06:43 PM, yac wrote:
So if you're relying on the presence of filed bugs to give some
sort of coverage metric, you're going to be out of luck from time
to time. For instance, that fun bug where stabilising a version
of libraw broke
On 3 October 2013 05:43, yac y...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd be cautious about involving users in this as it very often happens
to myself that something breaks, I get mad and then figure it was my
own fault (eg. messing with cflags I shouldn't mess with)
That does happen from time to time on the
El mar, 01-10-2013 a las 21:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Hello
This comes from:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481920
as we would like to set some saner (for systemd usage) defaults in a
subprofile, that way people could switch to it to inherit the changes
more easily). For
