Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/sctp to choose the right SCTP lib for Linux/FreeBSD?

2014-04-08 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 04/06/2014 17:05, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 06 Apr 2014, Joshua Kinard wrote: Derp, since this is a virtual for a linkable library, set DEPEND first, then RDEPEND to ${DEPEND}. No, setting RDEPEND (as it was in your previous version) in the virtual is enough. The package

[gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, extra testers wanted

2014-04-08 Thread Duncan
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:08:38 +0300 as excerpted: Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like regression from 0.1, speak up now. See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070 (I'm purposely special casing

[gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, Tracker bug #468386

2014-04-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible broken .png files within packages. The problem is broken IDAT lenght, an error that libpng15 still gracefully ignored, but libpng16 no longer ignores. The bug,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, Tracker bug #468386

2014-04-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 08/04/14 16:14, Samuli Suominen wrote: mailto:klausman... mailto:klausman... No idea how that happened. I blame Thunderbird.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ?

2014-04-08 Thread Marcin Mirosław
W dniu 2014-03-31 19:35, Toralf Förster pisze: On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote: On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ?

2014-04-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Marcin Mirosław mar...@mejor.pl wrote: According to last problem with openssl and +tls-heartbeat I'd like to see less features enabled by default. USE=-* isn't the best solution;) A bug in an upstream-supported feature is quite different from a patched-in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, Tracker bug #468386

2014-04-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible broken .png files within packages. The problem is broken IDAT lenght, an error that libpng15 still

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, Tracker bug #468386

2014-04-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible broken .png files within packages. The problem is broken IDAT

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, Tracker bug #468386

2014-04-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 22:25 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, Tracker bug #468386

2014-04-08 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 08/04/14 23:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 22:25 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, installing