[gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl

2014-07-12 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/ SHA256 139ac81c9478accd38a9eb667623d75997a2197cec36f184cd8d23e98a7e475b (yet none of it is signed) So libressl is meant as a drop-in replacement for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl

2014-07-12 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 07/12/14 08:37, hasufell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/ SHA256 139ac81c9478accd38a9eb667623d75997a2197cec36f184cd8d23e98a7e475b (yet none of it is signed) So libressl is meant

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl

2014-07-12 Thread hasufell
Anthony G. Basile: I just did a quick count of all packages which refer to dev-libs/openssl. I'm getting 590 packages. This will be quite a task. For ~arch we could probably do that with a script. For stable arch we should ask maintainers to do it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] splitting out arm keywords

2014-07-12 Thread Ruud Koolen
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 03:48:40 Matthew Thode wrote: arm has a historical problem with stabilization, while keywording doesn't require access to all arm sub-arches the problem with the stabilization slowness causes running a full ~arm to become hard. By that I mean that if someone keywords

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl

2014-07-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +, hasufell wrote: *snip* KEYWORDS=~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~s390 ~sh ~sparc ~x86 ~amd64-fbsd ~sparc-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~arm-linux ~x86-linux If a provider of the virtual is already stable, you can commit the virtual

[gentoo-dev] scanelf-based RDEPEND

2014-07-12 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
I'd like to ask for some help with https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512806 After the latest check I've done I think the list is valid and should be added to www-client/chromium's RDEPEND. Do you see any obvious problems with that? Should I perform some additional checks? Note that while

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl

2014-07-12 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:37 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: So libressl is meant as a drop-in replacement for openssl. Some caveats have already been discovered: http://devsonacid.wordpress.com/2014/07/12/how-compatible-is-libressl/ Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] The request to abolish games team policy

2014-07-12 Thread Denis Dupeyron
Please do not take this personally. I honestly wonder what all the fuss is about. There are a few games I've helped with over the years and I've never had any trouble at all having my stuff reviewed and accepted. And I'm a lousy ebuild writer. Every time I'd suggest a fix, bump, or new package,

Re: [gentoo-dev] The request to abolish games team policy

2014-07-12 Thread hasufell
Denis Dupeyron: I honestly wonder what all the fuss is about. It's about a dying project. I am collaborating with it since ~2 years and it isn't getting any better (afais I'm pretty much the only regular collaborator who is not on the team... many others stopped caring). So, this is about: