On 15/03/15 10:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
In case of issues, blockers especially, the users users are recommended
looks OK otherwise.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 15 March 2015 at 22:43, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone. Here's the first draft of news item for
gx86-multilib. I tried to cover all the important aspects. Please
review and let me know what you think.
Title: True multilib
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 14:02 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 12:30 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:57 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 11:41 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:08 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 09:12 AM,
On 14 March 2015 at 23:30, Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org wrote:
iirc most deb and rpm based distributions use main for their central
repository, so +1 for gentoo-main.
Add me for gentoo-main too.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:42:35 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks, that's very definitive. Still curious how it fits with the
findutils ebuild though.
program_prefix=$(usex userland_GNU '' g) econf \
--program-prefix=${program_prefix}
Not sure if this
On 03/15/2015 02:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
The name simply must be 'gentoo'.
Agreed: it should match repo_name.
As for the namespace, proj/ makes most sense of the current namespaces.
I agree with this too, but I don't care if we namespace it or make it
top-level.
Hello, everyone.
I would like to gladly announce that the gx86-multilib project has
finally reached the level of maturity allowing us to aim for stable
amd64. The few blockers left can be fixed with a single commit
at the time of the switch, so we'd like to set up the final date
as 2015-03-29,
On 15-03-2015 11:20:45 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official
ones. Of course, it would be a nice
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Instead of trying to emphasize it's the main repository, we ought to
drop the notion of 'main repository'. That was the goal of all changes
in Portage, so stop trying to regress for the sake of good ol' times.
But, if the
Hello, everyone.
Here's the first draft of news item for gx86-multilib. I tried to cover
all the important aspects. Please review and let me know what you think.
Title: True multilib support on amd64
Author: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-01-28
Revision: 1
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone. Here's the first draft of news item for
gx86-multilib. I tried to cover all the important aspects. Please
review and let me know what you think.
Title: True multilib support on amd64
Author: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Starting with 2015-03-29, we are enabling the true multilib support
on amd64 and masking the old emul-linux-x86 package sets for removal.
This change provides
I'm not a native
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, James Le Cuirot wrote:
I've long considered the -delete argument to find to be widely
supported enough that using it in ebuilds should not be a problem.
Indeed, a grep of the tree shows that it is frequently used, even in
eclasses.
I've just noticed that the man page
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
As for the namespace, proj/ makes most sense of the current
namespaces.
So on gitweb.gentoo.org our main tree would be listed amongst some
200 other proj repositories, between proj/gentoo-wiki-tyrian.git and
proj/proj/gentoolkit.git.
I think it
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to
consider moving other repositories there -- at least the official
ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having everything hosted
on git.g.o as
On 15 March 2015 at 21:54, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
. In that vain, gentoo-base
could also work?
I like this idea. I was initially toying with gentoo-overlay because it
was more specific than repo but it didn't float well because the model
was wrong.
gentoo-base however kinda
Dnia 2015-03-14, o godz. 22:25:56
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the
gentoo makes a lot of sense to me. gentoo-main works, as well.
Anything with ebuilds doesn't make as much as sense to me, since it
also contains profiles, eclasses, etc. In that vain, gentoo-base
could also work?
I don't really get the need for this whole namespacing thing, so I'd
prefer to do
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:25:38 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, James Le Cuirot wrote:
I've long considered the -delete argument to find to be widely
supported enough that using it in ebuilds should not be a problem.
Indeed, a grep of the tree shows that it
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Thanks, that's very definitive. Still curious how it fits with the
findutils ebuild though.
program_prefix=$(usex userland_GNU '' g) econf \
--program-prefix=${program_prefix}
Not sure if this answers your question, but find is defined as
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
Outside the context of Portage, repo can mean any git repository of any
kind, not merely a portage-usable repository.
Yeah, or an RPM repo, or a Mercurial repo... repo as a term is way
overloaded, so use it with care
# Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org (15 Mar 2015)
# These projects have been abandoned upstream. Most mplayer2 devs have moved
# on to media-video/mpv, and users are suggested to do the same. We have
# media-video/baka-mplayer and media-video/smplayer available as Qt-based GUIs.
# See bugs 452484,
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo (it's also the repo_name)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or
potentially confusing...
Definitely, it should be gentoo. Without portage, x86, or any
other
Am Samstag, 14. März 2015, 22:25:56 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the start of Gentoo,
On 03/15/15 09:20, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
If possible, please give the no-emul-linux-x86 sub-profiles some more
testing. Please note that you will likely want to ensure that you are
using the newest Portage version available before the upgrade, and you
may need to unmerge the
Ben de Groot posted on Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:25:08 +0800 as excerpted:
I would also say that 'true'
is incorrect, as the emul packages were also truly multilib, just
implemented in a different way. Maybe 'eclass-based' is more specific
and less opinionated?
Gentoo style build-from-sources?
--
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 15 March 2015 at 06:34, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
wrote:
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
Our repo is already named gentoo, so this
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2015-03-15 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
media-libs/sdl-flic 2015-03-09 16:56:27 mr_bones_
app-crypt/pinentry-qt 2015-03-10 20:27:34 k_f
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Vladimir Diaz vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am a developer in the Secure Systems Lab at NYU. Our lab has
collaborated with popular software update systems in the open-source
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:27:06 -0400
Vladimir Diaz vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Vladimir Diaz
vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am a developer in the Secure Systems Lab
30 matches
Mail list logo
