Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-25 Thread Consus
On 18:46 Thu 25 Feb, Kent Fredric wrote: > I'm considering bolting together some Perl that would allow you to run > a small HTTP service rooted in a git repo dir, and would then generate > given changes files on demand and then cache their results somehow. > > Then you could have a "Live changes a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-25 Thread Kent Fredric
On 25 February 2016 at 21:02, Consus wrote: > Well, we do have one > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/dev-lang/perl > > I bet folks want to check out what's new in their local copy of Portage > tree. With a custom, portage oriented, on-demand log generator you could produc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-25 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 25/02/16 08:59, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 25 February 2016 at 21:02, Consus wrote: >> Well, we do have one >> >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/dev-lang/perl >> >> I bet folks want to check out what's new in their local copy of >> Portage tree. > > > With a custom, portage or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-25 Thread Gordon Pettey
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Luis Ressel wrote: > > > > That would require a local git clone. And that's exactly what those who > > still want Changelogs are trying to avoid. > > You need even a deep git clone with full history. > > Already now this means that you need

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro

2016-02-25 Thread Raymond Jennings
I think this might be one reason that /etc/mtab was deprecated in favor of a symlink to /proc/mounts :P On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:22:36 -0500 as excerpted: > > > 4. In the runlevel paradigm you usually think