Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 13/06/16 10:09, M. J. Everitt wrote: > Excuse me .. and this thread emerged from deprecating the EXACT > thing you are suggesting!? I don't know what you are talking about. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 13/06/16 08:50, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > > > I still think you're underestimating the need for centralization. > > What you call a "core/base" package is probably going to end up > > being anything listed in a dependency. That is a LOT of packages, > > actually - we're not just talking

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/06/16 17:32, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 10/06/16 03:53 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: >> ... Their repositories would likely be amalgamations of our >> curated and reviewed repositories ... > Could you elaborate on what you mean by this?

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 13/06/16 09:04, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 11/06/16 09:00, Michał Górny wrote: > > If you are not going to maintain your contribution, we can't > > guarantee it will be accepted. I'm certainly not interested in > > having to worry about 20 more maintainer-needed packages next month > >

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 13/06/16 09:54, M. J. Everitt wrote: > I really think someone needs to do a bit of portageq and see what > the Tree *actually* contains > > Likewise .. a trek through bugzilla would also be enlightening for > those not familiar ... > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/06/16 22:37, Pacho Ramos wrote: > sys-apps/razercfg I'm not an ebuild person, but if someone could maintain this I would be grateful. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/06/16 09:00, Michał Górny wrote: > If you are not going to maintain your contribution, we can't > guarantee it will be accepted. I'm certainly not interested in > having to worry about 20 more maintainer-needed packages next month > because

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: flag URIs using http:// when https:// is available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Looks OK to me, but I'll let Brian have primary ACK on repoman for some time forward. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/06/16 18:18, Rich Freeman wrote: > And my understanding again for Exherbo And it is wrong again, according to an Exherbo user I talked to. Please get your Exherbo developer to participate directly, because I think you are having some trouble

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: kernel-2.eclass Prefix support

Michael Orlitzky writes: >> # Don't forget to make directory for sysfs >> -[[ ! -d ${ROOT}sys ]] && kernel_is 2 6 && mkdir ${ROOT}sys >> +[[ ! -d ${EROOT}sys ]] && kernel_is 2 6 && mkdir "${EROOT}"sys >> > > One more =) Nice catch! Jonathan Callen

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/06/16 12:38, Rich Freeman wrote: > So, I was chatting with an Exherbo dev. Their model isn't quite > what your earlier emails seemed to suggest (at least as I read > it). You should get them to reply to this thread, because... > As I

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/06/16 11:33, Consus wrote: > That's great, but how are you gonna prevent nodejs-like > clusterfuck[?] By not being nodejs. The core repos are curated and reviewed. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander

[gentoo-dev] Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: The future of the Sunrise project)

M. J. Everitt posted on Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:09:13 +0100 as excerpted: > On 13/06/16 09:04, Alexander Berntsen wrote: >> On 11/06/16 09:00, Michał Górny wrote: >> > If you are not going to maintain your contribution, we can't >> > guarantee it will be accepted. I'm certainly not interested in

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 07.06.2016 kell 20:28, kirjutas Michał Górny: >  > So here's how I would word it. I think if we combine a few different > texts, we may end up with something good ;-). > > --- > The LINGUAS USE flag group has been renamed to L10N, in order to > avoid > a conceptual clash

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:15 AM, james wrote: > and start coding your dream. I'm not that enthusiastic. It's up to the Gentoo masters if they would find it helpful to the community or not. > But the proven pathways, should be left > intact and receive further documentation,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/13/2016 10:59 AM, Duncan wrote: > M. J. Everitt posted on Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:09:13 +0100 as excerpted: > >> On 13/06/16 09:04, Alexander Berntsen wrote: >>> On 11/06/16 09:00, Michał Górny wrote: If you are not going to maintain your contribution, we can't guarantee it will be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi I'll take sys-apps/razercfg as a proxy maintainer. Regards, Ashish Gupta

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 09:55 Mon 13 Jun, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 10/06/16 17:32, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 10/06/16 03:53 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > >> ... Their repositories would likely be amalgamations of our > >> curated and reviewed

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

Consus wrote: > This is how overlays work right now. What are suggesting to change? Technically not a lot in terms of how packages get installed. It's more about offering support and/or visibility for overlays. So technically it's about hosting user repos, making the ebuilds within easily