Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:15:40PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand > wrote: > > On 08/28/2016 07:28 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > >> B. Backport just the changes needed for chromium to older ffmpeg > > > > Any chance of it

Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:28:48 +0200 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > C. Mask chromium's system-ffmpeg flag when the dependency on > ffmpeg-3.0.1 can't be satisfied I'd pick this option, mostly because this is the path that introduces the least amount of space for breaking

Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:28:48 +0200 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > See for context. > > chromium-54 is currently hard masked; it'd soon enter ~arch, and then > stable in ~6 weeks. ffmpeg-3.0.1 is currently hard masked. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

Work on making 3.1.x stable. In the mean time, mask system-ffmpeg.

Re: [gentoo-dev] base-system needs developers who care

On 08/24/2016 10:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mié, 24-08-2016 a las 16:05 +0200, Lars Wendler escribió: >> > [...] >> Oh, and to all new team members: >> Please keep in mind to *not* use EAPI-6 for base-system packages yet, >> so >> we can retain a somewhat stable upgrade path even for very old >>