Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 20∶59 -0600, użytkownik R0b0t1 napisał: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny > > napisał: > > > Hi, everyone. > > > > > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking in

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-perl/Mail-SPF-Query

# Kent Fredric (22 Nov 2017) # Long deprecated upstream in favour of dev-perl/Mail-SPF # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #638432 dev-perl/Mail-SPF-Query pgp6PtgkgQgsP.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 21/11/17 21:01, Manuel Rüger wrote: > Packages up for grabs: > > * app-crypt/yubikey-manager-qt > * sys-apps/etckeeper > * sys-auth/yubico-piv-tool > * dev-libs/libsodium > * app-editors/retext > * sys-apps/rkflashtool > * dev-embedded/esptool > * app-shells/thefuck > * app-crypt/paperkey > * de

[gentoo-dev] Re: cmake + ninja vs autotools

Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. Doing a full clean build [..] > the speed of make or ninja is hugely offset by the compilation speed, > and their overhead is negligible. It depends on the definition of negligible. For huge projects like boost or chromium it is several minutes: That'

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-mathematics/qtoctave

# Andreas Sturmlechner (21 Nov 2017) # Totally broken, depends on dead Qt4. Use sci-mathematics/octave[gui]. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bugs #598930, #615284, #614582, #631524 sci-mathematics/qtoctave

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 20∶59 -0600, użytkownik R0b0t1 > napisał: >> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny >> > napisał: >> > > Hi, everyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v4]

W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration > the points made during the Council pre-review. > > ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst > HTML: https://dev.gento

[gentoo-dev] Re: Prefix bootstrap script maintainability (Was: No more stable keywords for Games)

On 20-11-2017 11:53:32 -0600, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello friends! > > On Monday, November 20, 2017, Sergei Trofimovich <[1]sly...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:47:35 -0600 > > R0b0t1 <[2]r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Understanding an existing codebase should not be a technical > >>

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

On 21-11-2017 20:19:21 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: > Francesco Riosa writes: > > > maybe ewarn() is more appropriate than einfo()? > > Just in case it's executed outside the scope of prefix > > I can't remember any use case when portage (or, paludis, etc.) is > executed as a normal user but not a fro

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grab: dev-util/rebar

Hello everyone, I'm stepping down as the maintainer of dev-util/rebar, since I haven't been using it for quite a while. I already pointed this out on this very list a couple of months ago (when djc dropped erlang), but since noone else showed interest, I've dropped it to m-n now. rebar itself is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v4]

> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > Path and filename encoding > -- > The path fields in the Manifest file must consist of characters > corresponding to valid UTF-8 code points excluding the NULL character > (``U+``), the backwards slash (``\``) and charac