# Michael Palimaka (02 Dec 2017)
# Depends on dead Qt 4. Dead upstream.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #639252.
dev-vcs/qsvn
Hi,
Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
Thanks,
Alon
[1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2017, 21:43:53 CET schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> Thanks,
> Alon
>
> [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
Hi,
one of the devs said in #gentoo-ha
W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev
napisał:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
>
One reason might be that:
1) there's barely any use for it,
2) we have too many profiles,
On 12/02/2017 03:43 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> Thanks,
> Alon
>
> [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
>
I'm not sure if anything is using that particular profile
On 2 December 2017 at 23:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev
> napisał:
> > Hi,
> > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> >
>
> One reason might be that:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 16:13:47 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if anything is using that particular profile. I tried to
> create a new subprofile myself,
>
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/ab7ef753aa88f21c8a05d667cf511a24
>
> and wound up (indirectly) using arch
Its from me, so it sucks, most can ignore, its spam, nothing useful, etc
Feel free to TLDR; For those that decide to :)
Netbeans 9, built under Java 9, running on Java 9 :) Like no where else!
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5a20b8eb0b3e91.03603173.jpg
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5a20
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:19:23 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> dev-perl/MogileFS-*
On behalf of the Perl team I can keep this on life support till it
ceases to be maintainable.
( And Perl is already on its maintainer list )
pgpsJ59UMf60E.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello, everyone.
This is something that's been talked about privately a lot lately but it
seems that nobody went forward to put things into motion. SO here's
a proposal that aims to improve the condition of our mailing lists
and solve some of the problems they are facing today.
Problems
Hello,
In every mailing list conversation, there are at least three people:
the two conversing, and the future reader. I point this out as I think
it important that everyone realize that not all posts are written for
those immediately participating in the conversation.
Some time ago I was offered
19:09 @floppym | wltjr really seems to make shit up when he
doen't know what he's talking about.
19:20@mgorny | lol
19:20@mgorny | we're talking about the real wltjr or the
r0b0t1 fake identity?
19:21 @floppym | mgorny: There's a fake?
19:22@mgorny | didn't you n
12 matches
Mail list logo
