Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash

2018-08-30 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Michał Górny schrieb: So maybe mask it, but not remove? Maybe it's time you realize that if you want something to stay, then you need to actually *take it* and *fix it*. Keeping clearly broken stuff so that every user could try jumping through a few hoops to build it has no value. I think

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Avoid stripping ld.so ?

2018-08-30 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:37:16 + Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > Tweaking ebuild to expand STRIP_MASK for ld.so might help. > > > > OK, can I use STRIP_MASK outside ebuilds, like in /etc/portage/make.conf or > > in my profile? Something like STRIP_MASK="/lib64/ld-* /lib/ld-*" I believe you

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Avoid stripping ld.so ?

2018-08-30 Thread Zac Medico
On 08/29/2018 01:10 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Is there a way for portage to avoid strippning debug syms for ld.so ? > I would like to avoid building all of glibc with debug syms. Maybe use FEATURES=splitdebug together with INSTALL_MASK="/usr/lib/debug -ld-*.so.debug"? -- Thanks, Zac

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New global USE flag: gtk-doc

2018-08-30 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 24.08.2018 kell 23:06, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: > Longer version idea: > Build and install gtk-doc based developer documentation for dev- > util/devhelp, IDE and offline use This has been pushed now with initial consumers (fresh meson based packages or converts from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash

2018-08-30 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Michał Górny schrieb: I think it is a valid concern that removal of packages may sometimes be overzealous, and to better keep packages in the tree as long as they are useful and workarounds exist for build/runtime problems. Just in case of gnash there is really no benefit in keeping it. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash

2018-08-30 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Andrew Savchenko schrieb: # Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn (29 Aug 2015) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Multiple build failures. Upstream inactive. # (bugs #321017, #581284, #588692, #602786, #649006, #654140) www-plugins/gnash Is there any replacement available? AFAIK no, at least among

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash

2018-08-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 12:01 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:20:31 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > wrote: > > # Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn (29 Aug 2015) > > # Masked for removal in 30 days. Multiple build failures. Upstream inactive. > > # (bugs #321017, #581284,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash

2018-08-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 20:36 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Michał Górny schrieb: > > > So maybe mask it, but not remove? > > > > > > > Maybe it's time you realize that if you want something to stay, then you > > need to actually *take it* and *fix it*. Keeping clearly broken stuff

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Avoid stripping ld.so ?

2018-08-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 09:15 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 23:58 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > > the content is

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Avoid stripping ld.so ?

2018-08-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 23:58 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:10:54 + > Joakim Tjernlund

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-boot/winusb

2018-08-30 Thread Mikle Kolyada
# Mikle Kolyada (30 Aug 2018) # Dead upstream, does not work properly. # Unmaintained. # Use sys-boot/woeusb instead. sys-boot/winusb signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature