On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 13:31 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> Since there were no major objections raised against the proposal of
> switching user/group management to dedicated acct-*/* packages, I'd like
> to proceed as follows:
>
> 1. Commit GLEP 81 draft (as of last posting [1],
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
net-ftp/ftpbase/ftpbase-0.01-r3.ebuild | 39 ++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 net-ftp/ftpbase/ftpbase-0.01-r3.ebuild
diff --git a/net-ftp/ftpbase/ftpbase-0.01-r3.ebuild
b/net-ftp/ftpbase/ftpbase-0.01-r3.ebuild
new
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
acct-user/ftp/ftp-0.ebuild | 14 ++
acct-user/ftp/metadata.xml | 5 +
profiles/categories| 1 +
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-user/ftp/ftp-0.ebuild
create mode 100644 acct-user/ftp/metadata.xml
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
acct-group/ftp/ftp-0.ebuild | 9 +
acct-group/ftp/metadata.xml | 5 +
profiles/categories | 1 +
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-group/ftp/ftp-0.ebuild
create mode 100644 acct-group/ftp/metadata.xml
diff --git
Hi,
Here's the RFC for first acct-* packages I'd like to commit. This is
also a request to reserve the respective UIDs/GIDs. Namely:
Groups:
ftp - 21
mail - 12 (on Linux, FreeBSD has it in baselayout)
Users:
ftp - 21
mail - 8 (on Linux, likewise)
postmaster - 14
I have included
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
acct-user/mail/mail-0.ebuild | 15 +++
acct-user/mail/metadata.xml | 8
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-user/mail/mail-0.ebuild
create mode 100644 acct-user/mail/metadata.xml
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
acct-group/mail/mail-0.ebuild | 9 +
acct-group/mail/metadata.xml | 8
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-group/mail/mail-0.ebuild
create mode 100644 acct-group/mail/metadata.xml
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
acct-user/postmaster/metadata.xml| 8
acct-user/postmaster/postmaster-0.ebuild | 15 +++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-user/postmaster/metadata.xml
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
net-mail/mailbase/mailbase-1.5-r1.ebuild | 45
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 net-mail/mailbase/mailbase-1.5-r1.ebuild
diff --git a/net-mail/mailbase/mailbase-1.5-r1.ebuild
b/net-mail/mailbase/mailbase-1.5-r1.ebuild
"gamestat" group with gid 36, as defined by QA policy:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Policies#Games
Not attaching the ebuild, because it's standard boilerplate, defining
only two variables:
DESCRIPTION="Group for shared game state files"
ACCT_GROUP_ID=36
Its first
Am 06.06.19 um 17:28 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> Didn't we have some "archive" for old ebuilds? Maybe we can move
> it there.
What about an overlay for this purpose? Its like in real life they
come into life and leave the same way...
Despite that, I usually dig in the git repository when I
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
> Here's the RFC for first acct-* packages I'd like to commit. This is
> also a request to reserve the respective UIDs/GIDs. Namely:
> Groups:
> ftp - 21
> mail - 12 (on Linux, FreeBSD has it in baselayout)
> Users:
> ftp - 21
> mail - 8
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/acct-group/mail/mail-0.ebuild
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors
> +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> +
> +EAPI=7
> +
> +inherit acct-group
> +
> +DESCRIPTION="Mail program
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 13:49 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> "gamestat" group with gid 36, as defined by QA policy:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Policies#Games
>
> Not attaching the ebuild, because it's standard boilerplate, defining
> only two variables:
>
>
Since acct-* packages do not create any files (except for keepfile
for the home directory), it is perfectly normal for the LICENSE
to be empty.
---
repoman/lib/repoman/modules/scan/metadata/ebuild_metadata.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 14:57 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/acct-group/mail/mail-0.ebuild
> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > +# Copyright 2019 Gentoo Authors
> > +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>
On 6/18/2019 7:31 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> 3. Give people some time for wider testing.
>
> At this point, the new eclasses would be non-binding, i.e. you will
> still be able to commit new packages using user.eclass old style.
> The eclasses would be bound with usual eclass stability
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 09:07 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
> On 6/18/2019 7:31 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > 3. Give people some time for wider testing.
> >
> > At this point, the new eclasses would be non-binding, i.e. you will
> > still be able to commit new packages using user.eclass old style.
> >
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 18:35 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:33:04AM -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 20, 2019 3:11:07 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Please review.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
Dear all,
A few months ago, I got back to my constraint-based dependency solver for
portage, that I had to leave for a while.
Thanks to Zac Medico, it is now based on portage itself to query the portage
tree, and so the code is far simpler (and far less buggy).
It is on github:
On 6/20/19 12:02 PM, michael.lienha...@laposte.net wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> A few months ago, I got back to my constraint-based dependency solver for
> portage, that I had to leave for a while.
> Thanks to Zac Medico, it is now based on portage itself to query the portage
> tree, and so the code
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 3:11:07 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review.
>
> [1]
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/UID_GID_Assignment
>
it's probably wort adding links to other distro standard UIDs as a reference.
RHEL[1]
Fedora[2]
Arch[3]
[1]
On 6/20/19 5:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Since acct-* packages do not create any files (except for keepfile
> for the home directory), it is perfectly normal for the LICENSE
> to be empty.
> ---
> repoman/lib/repoman/modules/scan/metadata/ebuild_metadata.py | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 11:33 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> On Thursday, June 20, 2019 3:11:07 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Please review.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/UID_GID_Assignment
> >
>
> it's probably wort adding links to other distro
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:33:04AM -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> On Thursday, June 20, 2019 3:11:07 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> >
> > Please review.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/UID_GID_Assignment
> >
>
> it's probably wort adding links
On 6/9/2019 7:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> +Specification
> +=
> +
> +Policy
> +--
> +
> +Following the acceptance of this GLEP, all new users and groups must
> +be created via user/group packages as defined in this GLEP. The old
> +method may still be used for existing
On 6/20/19 9:53 AM, Brian Evans wrote:
>> +
>> +Following the acceptance of this GLEP, all new users and groups must
>> +be created via user/group packages as defined in this GLEP. The old
>> +method may still be used for existing users/groups, in existing
>> +packages.
>> +
>> +All new users and
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
profiles/package.mask | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/profiles/package.mask b/profiles/package.mask
index ec22b0c89967..2065a8980d0e 100644
--- a/profiles/package.mask
+++ b/profiles/package.mask
@@ -29,6 +29,28 @@
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 09:53 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
> On 6/9/2019 7:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > +Tracking of user/group usage is done through dependencies. As long
> > +as any installed package depends on a specific user/group package,
> > +the respective user/group is assumed to be used.
The G/FBSD team is not really capable of supporting a stable profile
anymore. More and more packages are failing due to upstream relying
on Linux userland and/or newer FreeBSD version. At the same time, our
core packages are outdated and vulnerable, and nobody worked on them
for a long time.
30 matches
Mail list logo
