On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:17:31 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 07:54 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:29:33 -0400
> > "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/19/19 3:19 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > > > This is now tracked as
Dear all,
Situation:
We have different date formats in packages.mask.
Change:
I suggest that we start using the date format -mm-dd
for all dates in packages.mask
starting with 2019-07-01
The following changes in packages.mask will introduce the date format,
specify the timezone, and use
On Sat, 2019-06-29 at 13:23 +0200, Jonas Stein wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Situation:
> We have different date formats in packages.mask.
>
>
> Change:
> I suggest that we start using the date format -mm-dd
> for all dates in packages.mask
> starting with 2019-07-01
>
> The following changes in
Hi Jonas,
Jonas Stein writes:
> Dear all,
>
> Situation:
> We have different date formats in packages.mask.
>
> Change:
> I suggest that we start using the date format -mm-dd
> for all dates in packages.mask
> starting with 2019-07-01
For me isodate is more readable. I would vote for this
I think ISO 8601 date format is an improvement.
However, as you're suggesting to use a date at UTC time, this begs for
scripting, such as the old echangelog did. Then, when scripted, the
actual date format is no longer an issue. Somehow the current format
looks easier to read (for humans) to
Hi Michał,
I see your argument with "Larry" as bad example user.
I will not touch it for now.
But we should think about it some day later because we have Larry as
example user in many places already. I will put this in another RFC.
>> * 2019-01-01 + 30 days is unclear, if we do not use UTC time
Hi Fabian,
> I think ISO 8601 date format is an improvement.
Great.
> However, as you're suggesting to use a date at UTC time, this begs for
> scripting, such as the old echangelog did.
Absolutely but this is a more complicate step, I want to discuss this later.
--
Best,
Jonas
Hi Benda,
thank you for your quick response.
>> Change:
>> I suggest that we start using the date format -mm-dd
>> for all dates in packages.mask
>> starting with 2019-07-01
>
> For me isodate is more readable. I would vote for this change.
Great.
I know, that some people prefer their
