Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
> Works great for whom? How many deployments are we talking about? To be > honest, I don't think I've stumbled upon a single instance. > On the other hand, GitLab deployments are pretty common -- GNOME, Xfce, > Debian come instantly to my mind. Then, there's Heptapod -- the GitLab > fork for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Toralf Förster
On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > The problem when doing review on Github > for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see > what's changed in new revision versus previous revision. That's my main concern with the current behaviour: a "git diff" often

RE: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, is this really CI _vs_ Code Review? I.e. we can only have one? CI is nice and helpful. For example I usually don't start review until CI sets green light but CI alone wouldn't be enough. Thought that Gitlab will support same kind of hooks similar to how current CI is integrated into Github,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Louis Sautier
On 27/05/2020 15:22, Guilherme Amadio wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: >> On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >>> The problem when doing review on Github >>> for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-libs/x265/

2020-05-27 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 14:14 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: [...] > > > > > Assuming that the pic performance penalty is really only relevant > > on > > legacy arches (like x86), here are a couple of options: > > > > 1. Disable pic on arches where tie performance penalty is small. > > 2. Force pic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi, On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > The problem when doing review on Github > > for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see > > what's changed in new revision versus previous revision.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 27 May 2020 17:39:21 +0200 Piotr Karbowski wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/05/2020 01.31, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > * dev-python/boto3 > > * dev-python/botocore > > Do you mind if I join you on those? I use them a lot, and I planned to > comaintain awscli since Patrick is the only one current

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Piotr Karbowski
Hi, On 27/05/2020 01.31, Brian Dolbec wrote: > * dev-python/boto3 > * dev-python/botocore Do you mind if I join you on those? I use them a lot, and I planned to comaintain awscli since Patrick is the only one current maintainer of those, boto3 is vital part of it too. -- Piotr. signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Christopher Head
On Wed, 27 May 2020 11:38:39 +0200 Nils Freydank wrote: > Zoltan, I prepared a branch with khard plus metadata.xml and would > like to ask you to merge it into your PR as you took deps of khard: > > https://github.com/holgersson32644/gentoo/tree/bump-khard Hi Nils, I already had a PR[1] open

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-libs/x265/

2020-05-27 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 26 May 2020 23:41:28 +0200 zo...@gentoo.org wrote: > tisdag 26 maj 2020 kl. 19:54:51 CEST skrev Alexis Ballier: > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 10:45:39 -0400 > > > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > Note that having the 'pic' useflag should be considered > > > > something to be fixed: rewrite the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > Hi, > > is this really CI _vs_ Code Review? I.e. we can only have one? > I'll try to come back to this. We can make computers do anything, but it's a question of limited time for me and for Gentoo as a whole. > > CI is nice and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:14 AM Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: >> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together >> > demos of CI services and things like gitlab /

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 01:14 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting > > together > > > demos of CI services and things like

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700 > Alec Warner wrote: > > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting > > together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit > > and so on. > > > > Some of these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Zoltan Puskas
Hey, > I have transitioned to "away" state as I have to reclaim my time for other > uses. Here I am trying to reduce the scope of my Gentoo responsibilities to > make potential return to activity less dreadful and overwhelming. > > ... > > Call for co-maintainers or successors >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting > together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit > and so on. > > Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code > review /

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting > together > > demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on. > > > > Some of these come in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Alarig Le Lay
Hi, On Tue 26 May 2020 23:12:06 GMT, Andrey Utkin wrote: > WIFI access point service: > > * net-wireless/hostapd > (Co-maintained by zerochaos, still additional attention is encouraged.) I can take it. Regards, -- Alarig

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together > demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on. > > Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code > review / pull

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Nils Freydank
Hi, I can add my already bumped app-misc/khard and start to co-maintain it via p.m. project. Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2020 um 06:00:18 Uhr +0200 schrieb Zoltan Puskas : > [...] > I'm happy to take dev-python/ruamel-yaml and dev-python/ruamel-yaml-clib > either > as a solo or as a comaintainer.