Are there any useful checks or behaviors of repoman that are missing
from pkgcheck and pkgcommit?
Fixing ebuild copyright date is the first one that comes to mind.
On 3/9/22 10:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
dev-util/pkgcheck and
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:27 PM Maciej Barć wrote:
>
> > Are there any useful checks or behaviors of repoman that are missing
> > from pkgcheck and pkgcommit?
>
> Fixing ebuild copyright date is the first one that comes to mind.
pkgcommit does this.
Just a quick though:
Looking at the man page of repoman it doesn't look to difficult to
replicate the behavior with pkgcheck. Meaning, we could think of
creating a drop-in replacement for "repoman [full]" (which would just
call pkgcheck) and "repoman commit" which actually does much more than
On 3/9/2022 4:28 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:27 PM Maciej Barć wrote:
Are there any useful checks or behaviors of repoman that are missing
from pkgcheck and pkgcommit?
Fixing ebuild copyright date is the first one that comes to mind.
pkgcommit does this.
I highly
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, at 15:47 CST, Matt Turner wrote:
> [...]
>
> I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm
> personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here.
I did not intend to imply that you should do anything.
I just want to point out that we had
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:00 PM Matt Turner wrote:
>
> Are there any useful checks or behaviors of repoman that are missing
> from pkgcheck and pkgcommit?
Would it make sense to package pkgcommit or otherwise stick it
somewhere official? I know there is a copy on mgorny's github
repo/blog, but
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
> dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts)
There's also dev-util/pkgdev as an alternative to pkgcommit with more
features for those that
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:34 PM Matthias Maier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, at 15:47 CST, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm
> > personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here.
>
> I did not intend to
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:18 PM Matthias Maier wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, at 17:32 CST, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> > I think you just made that number up :)
>
> Nah. My sample was just bad (ago just made a sizable number of commits.
>
> I would estimate the current usage of repoman to be
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:15 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:00 PM Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> > Are there any useful checks or behaviors of repoman that are missing
> > from pkgcheck and pkgcommit?
>
> Would it make sense to package pkgcommit or otherwise stick it
> somewhere
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:32 PM Brian Evans wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2022 4:28 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:27 PM Maciej Barć wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are there any useful checks or behaviors of repoman that are missing
> >>> from pkgcheck and pkgcommit?
> >>
> >> Fixing ebuild copyright
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, at 17:32 CST, Matt Turner wrote:
> I think you just made that number up :)
Nah. My sample was just bad (ago just made a sizable number of commits.
I would estimate the current usage of repoman to be about 20-25%, down
from well over 80-90% back when we just switched to
I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts)
are far superior replacements, and it makes sense to have people using
the same tool and seeing the same warnings as in the CI.
Are there any useful checks or
On 3/9/2022 4:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts)
are far superior replacements, and it makes sense to have people using
the same tool and seeing the same warnings as
On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote:
> I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
> dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts)
> are far superior replacements, and it makes sense to have people using
> the same tool and seeing the same warnings
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:37 PM Matthias Maier wrote:
>
>
> Just a quick though:
>
> Looking at the man page of repoman it doesn't look to difficult to
> replicate the behavior with pkgcheck. Meaning, we could think of
> creating a drop-in replacement for "repoman [full]" (which would just
> call
# Sam James (2022-03-09)
# Depends on very-old slot of SpiderMonkey which shouldn't be
# used with untrusted input (vulnerable to lots of security bugs).
# No reverse dependencies and no updates upstream for a long while.
# Stuck on EAPI 5 too. Removal on 2022-04-09. bug #832313.
# Sam James (2022-03-09)
# EAPI 5, out-of-date. Not packaged by any other distributions.
# Removal on 2022-04-09.
dev-java/edtftpj
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2022-03-09)
# Fails to build, stuck on EAPI 5.
# bug #690606, bug #830937, bug #833397.
# Removal on 2022-04-09.
dev-java/cortado
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 9 Mar 2022, at 14:34, Sam James wrote:
>
> # Sam James (2022-03-09)
> # Fails to build, stuck on EAPI 5.
> # bug #690606, bug #830937, bug #833397.
> # Removal on 2022-04-09.
> dev-java/cortado
Cancelled. I'd missed that games-strategy/freecol still needs it.
signature.asc
20 matches
Mail list logo
