Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal

2022-07-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 04/07/2022 17.27, David Seifert wrote: Ultimately, all these things really matter when only the defaults change. Turn-right-on-red in the US is such a thing, because unless otherwise stated, it's the norm. Knowing our devbase, with roughly 75% mostly AWOL and barely reading the MLs, I don't th

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal

2022-07-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:42 AM Florian Schmaus wrote: > > > It appears that we have at least two options here: > > A) Establish that the default is non-maintainer-commits-welcome, and > introduce a metadata element. > > B) Declare the default to be unspecified and introduce two metadata > element

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal

2022-07-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 16:19 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote: > I'd like to propose a new metadata XML element for packages: > > > > Maintainers can signal to other developers (and of course contributors > in general) that they are happy with others to make changes to the > ebuilds without pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal

2022-07-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 06-07-2022 15:50:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 16:19 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > I'd like to propose a new metadata XML element for packages: > > > > > > > > Maintainers can signal to other developers (and of course contributors > > in general) that they ar