sense. However, this particular enhancement does not need it.
IMHO a text based file has a big advantage in this proposed application
over fileformats which use XML: Any administrator can read it with his
editor of choice, right from the console.
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
stick to the facts...
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDa6+TaVNL8NrtU6IRAh7fAJ0WL6M0+KTk9uNQzIJxjS1YDVzN+ACdHMvY
OVj8WvjhXuN638d7Zs/Dvo8=
=zt9G
-END PGP SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Xavier Neys schrieb:
| Danny van Dyk wrote:
|
|> Xavier Neys schrieb:
|> | Discarding XML for the reasons some are using is like recommending
|> | key=value flat .ini files because windows used it in the 80s.
|> | They have to be parsed
e',
he's to be removed from email forwarding and CVS RO Access. I really
don't see the problem here.
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDf2eVaVNL8Nr
ote. (For this you can also read
seemants mail announcing the availability of the logs)
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDf5OjaVNL8NrtU6IRAhzLAJ9Bi1xUcRj7kKE2M
| I'd appreciate a nice welcome and a descent slap on the butt when you
| pass him...
SpanKY: He said _butt_!!!one!
| Joshua, welcome!
Welcome aboard, Joshua!
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
the handbook (which ends up on the
installcds) and to move it out of the scope of ricers.
Advanced won't need that documentation anyway, as they don't qualify as
adcaneced if they do! (At least in my eyes)
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc schrieb:
| 22.11.2005, 19:13:36, Danny van Dyk wrote:
|
|
|>Thomas Kirchner schrieb: | I'm against this change, personally.
Stage1 has
|>*always* been for | advanced users. If someone screws up their own system
|>(which is
blem with the council process which has been
eliminated by denying to vote on GLEPs which haven't been discussed
sufficiently starting with GLEP 42.
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
t GLEPs,
and he's ok with, though he wanted to have input from -dev first, so:
Anyone objecting to change those dates from "dd-mon-" format to
"-mm-dd"?
If not, i'll commit my diff in 24h...
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Pro
@@
~ Status: Active
~ Type: Informational
~ Content-Type: text/x-rst
- -Created: 31-May-2003
- -Post-History: 1-Jun-2003, 2-Jul-2003
+Created: 2003-05-31
+Post-History: 2003-06-01, 2003-07-02
Do you _really_ think this make a GLEP necessary?
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo
| Doing things properly wouldn't be difficult here. GLEP 43 took less
| than half an hour. It's worth doing it for the sake of not confusing
| future GLEP authors.
I just change all date strings in all glep-.txt ... Nobody will be
confused if he has a look into the template GLEP firs
really appreciate it being added to portage rather sooner
than later.
Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to C++
users:
~ DEPENDS="gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1"
Comments?
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
G
s has a purpose: There are a lot of packages in the tree which need a
proper FORTRAN compiler installed (not f2c). Without the default fortran
USE flag, people who use the GRP wouldn't be able to emerge them w/o
recompiling gcc.
As soon as USE based atoms are available, the Scientific Project w
s to set
RESTRICT="stricter" for them. On the other hand, some binary UPSTREAMs
are very kind and competent to handle such bugs if you tell them. AMD
for example, who will fix an "exectuable stack" problem in ACML after
the holidays.
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
irm, helping manage inventory control and various clerical
duties. I also am a big fan of the GNU project and the Free software
ideologies it puts forth."
Welcome Peter!
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
of Applied Sciences. Though he's been using
Linux and Gentoo for several years now, he found and still find time
playing basketball, reading a good book (especially Tolkien and Tad
Williams) and listening to loud music.
Welcome aboard Tobias!
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Make that -fno-omit-frame-pointer for x86 only. amd64 has no problems
wrt to debuging frame-pointer-less executables.
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP
. ${CATEGORY_FILE}
cat=${!cat}
for i in $(seq 0 $(( [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1)) ) ; do
echo -e "${cat[${i}]}"
done
)
Comments? Please keep in mind that the code snippets here are just
proof-of-concept code and not meant literally!
Danny
- --
Danny v
ou agree with the contents, please ask yourself if the current
discussion is necessary.
I'm looking forward to your answers on the last 2 points.
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
e.
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEBKe7aVNL8NrtU6IRAl75AKCT9h+9V4sM9YxRgIoaD+136dug9ACgkqoI
chBYTGNn2hEChDAi/WfV1+k=
=INNg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
hat chokes on coding style (like tabs and whitespaces) should be
> ifself fixed.
Hmm, you never used repoman, right? repoman checks for whitespace and tab
oddities and warns you, if you want to commit them.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
tion "
echo
}
pkg_prepare() {
local ret=0
if use foo && use bar ; then
emutexuse foo bar
ret=1
fi
if use fnord2 && ! use fnord ; then
emissinguse fnord fnord2
ret=1
and
swiming, watching movies and chilling with his favourite music.
Karol joined Gentoo to help with the Gentoo/OpenBSD project. I guess Flameeyes
will be happy with another slav^H^Hminio^H^H^Hhelping hand :-)
Karol, welcome aboard :-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo
Portage tree, and you're not fit to be a Gentoo dev in the first place
I would say this should be clarified some more. Surely anybody with an access
to an overlay can commit, but the projects should be the keepers of the keys.
Overlays are not the tree, they are probably very experimental.
stated
above.
This is how it has been handled so far except in the ciaranm incident. This is
how I personally think this should be handled in future.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
tions!
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
irith? ;-)). His current work is a research job at the
Federal University of Itajubá where he tries to build Cylons^H^H^H neural
networks. At least this is more exciting than his brother's job who's a math
professor.
bbj, welcome aboard!
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
It is my pleasure to announce publicly that ian! has passed all
necessary quizzes to touch our holy gra^H^H^H portage tree.
He'll be helping mcummings in his perpetuate combat with perl and its
dependencies. May the source be with him.
Congratulations Christian! :-)
Danny
--
Dann
don't file bugs with gentoo. Come to
#paludis and discuss with us. If we tell you to do so, file bugs with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We are really interested to know which packages
don't work.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
in touch.
I which you all the best for whatever you'll be doing next. :-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
see no major difference between doing 'need-cmake x.y' and
'NEED_CMAKE x.y'...
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
t;
>
> is it ok ?
Rather use
DEPEND="dev-util/cmake-${NEED_CMAKE+-${NEED_CMAKE}}"
please.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 01:10 schrieb Danny van Dyk:
> Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 00:50 schrieb Panard:
> > I removed need-cmake function and add :
> >
> > if [ ! -z "${NEED_CMAKE}" ]; then
> > DEPEND="dev-util/cmake"
> > else
> >
lementations are hardcoded into the modules rather than being
> autodetected from the system. This just doesn't scale well, and it
> ties upgrades and changes to BLAS/LAPACK/whatever into a required
> update of eselect.
>
> A point of disagreement between Danny van Dyk (Ku
execute the new code instead.
As a member of Release Engineering who encountered already a problem
with user-management code in eutils.eclass, i beg you: _plase_
don't add it to that eclass. Instead, create a new eclass 'euser' or
something similar and add it there.
Dann
this and you'll break merging of approx. 30% of the ebuild in
scientific herd. As long as there is no use-based deps, fortran should
stay in default.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi Kumba,
> In a similar vein, will this eselect tool eventually supplant the
> functionality of binutils-config as well (and thus need its own
> wrapper script)?
Have a look at eselect binutils please, which is shipped with
app-admin/eselect.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTEC
r an enhancement request. I'm
quite positive we can get it going. :-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ny damage to applications that have not been directly
> installed from the overlay.
Only when you got FEATURES="collision-protect".
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ny damage to applications that have not been directly
> installed from the overlay.
>
That is only true, if you have enabled FEATURES="collision-protect".
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ny damage to applications that have not been directly
> installed from the overlay.
Only when you have FEATURES="collision-protect".
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
maintain it.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
g
Thanks, I accept this nomination.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
has support for xchg16 since the very beginning.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
feel
uncomfortable to be unable to use cpuflags in metadata phase. This is
what worries me most.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Freitag, 7. Juli 2006 16:19 schrieb Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò:
> On Friday 07 July 2006 16:20, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > I suggest to add a "CPUFLAGS" USE_EXPAND variable to the tree.
>
> Improvement respect the current situation? You're just asking f
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 15:23 schrieb Matthias Schwarzott:
> On Wednesday 12 July 2006 15:16, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > Hi all,
> While reading your list I have seen pcmcia often. e.g. on my ebuild
> v4l-dvb-hg not supporting pcmcia as conditional. A bit digging showed
> tha
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 17:00 schrieb Aron Griffis:
> Danny van Dyk wrote: [Wed Jul 12 2006, 09:16:30AM EDT]
>
> > There are 505 ebuilds which are missing use flags in IUSE that they
> > use in other places.
Much of those 505 violations are a missing pcmcia flag, which i stop
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 15:36 schrieb Jakub Moc:
> Danny van Dyk wrote:
>
> Wrt the pcmcia thing, well not really ebuilds' fault, see
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122868
Yeah, genstef is working on it.
> There are already bugs filed for some of the rest
haviour changed. Much better than
informing users of the other 4 packages that the behaviour changed.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
d making FEATURES="test" a
default.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 11:19 schrieb Kevin F. Quinn:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 02:39:16 +0200
>
> Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 02:11 schrieb Kevin F. Quinn:
> > > At the very least, ebuild maintainers and ATs should be runnin
pe team.
Not to forget he's working on an eselect module for app-admin/logrotate.
Welcome aboard, Andrew!
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
27;t be to hard to change it from /emul to /lib32
and /usr/lib32. And yes, /emul was there from the very beginning aka
Tester/brad_mssw :-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
job'. We _could_ implement it, but none of the possible implementations
is really elegant. We considered these possibilites:
* using an external repo, that autogenerates the dep information _after
downloading all of CPAN_. (yes, that would be necessary)
* g-cpan mode of autogenerating the bu
Handbook list of authors contains former
Gentoo devs.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
new file for that IMHO. I'd propose to add something
like
ECLASS_DEPRECATED="${ECLASS_DEPRECATED} foo"
ECLASS_REPLACEMENTS="${ECLASS_REPLACEMENT} new-foo"
to foo.eclass. In my eyes this is much less work as repoman merely has
to check for 2 envvars.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ere two deprecated eclasses, it
> would falsely label the new class as mod-kernels.
ECLASS_DEPRECATED="${ECLASS_DEPRECATED} foo:new-foo,new-foo-modules"
> Meanwhile; I'd just stick a file up somewhere on gentoo.org, and
> mangle repoman to pull down a copy every N days as ne
ch compilation would actually succeed, you'd
still have ~8e28 seconds. The age of the universe is approximately 4e17
seconds.
This hasn't yet investigated allt he possible combinations of packages
depending on dev-lang/php, or the ~10,000 other packages in the tree.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
t.
Sadly we don't suspend developers for extended history of QA violations.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
non
cummultative. I'd like to keep it hardcoded, as loading of such
variables can go wrong and you'd end up without a working env tool.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Just a short note:
The new council will be showing more presence in #gentoo-council.
This means: even when no meeting is taking place you can reach us all
together on IRC to discuss Gentoo development or to point out problems.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 P
net-wireless/{bcm43xx,ieee80211softmac} had been in package mask since
June, as they
* didn't work with recent kernel versions
* were moved into kernel as of 2.6.17.
* were plain obsolete.
I just removed them.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 20:56 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > * How do you want to implement the profiles?
> >
> > * Re: the meta-ebuilds you'd been talking about in this thread:
> > Have you yet considered to use the profiles' p
that more llama action be put in GLEPS (rar?).
Senseless.
What did you want to contribute to the discussion?
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
s mailing list. I for one don't consider it anywhere near
appropriate. This shall be no offense, just a comment in regard that
you can do better.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi all,
FYI, I just created a Bugzilla account for the Council.
You can assign/CC us on bugs via '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ven't) made my time here so
> enjoyable.
Thank you very much
> So long, and thanks for all the fish...
I think you oughta know that I'm feeling very depressed :-(
Danny, who hopes to see you again next year!
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ould take
some time, it should be done in a seperate repository for the time
being.
The Seeds project could do something like this:
+-Seeds
|
+-amd64-lamp, inherits releases/2006.1/amd64-hardened and adds lamp
specific useflags/packages.
But i lack knowledge here. Stuart?
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Y}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
Yay!
> I thought we were eventually going to use that format to specify deps
> with specific USE set.
Nope, that was ${CATEGORY}/${PN}[foo].
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
lt USE-flags at one spot (per profile) _is_ easier to maintain.
Ciaran has a point here: Default useflags have annoyed me in the past
while building releases, and having to change several packages (and
redigesting them) for the snapshot is way more:
* complicated
* time-consuming
* error-prone
tha
nches/branch-1.0.x.
* Use only modules from branch-1.0.x when you update/bump packages in
the tree, as it will take sometime till 1.2.x will hit the tree.
Thank you for your attention :-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev
alyst, new profile
structure, planning for 2007.0
Robbin H. Johnson: tree-signing, infra (Bugzilla, anon(cvs|svn))
Danny van Dyk: AMD64 releng (testing, soon new profiles)
Kingtaco: infra(Bugzilla, anon(cvs|svn), utf8 on pecker)
Mike Frysinger:tool
; is (in my eyes) at
least sloppy. If it doesn't work for all sensible cases, it shouldn't
be labelled as 'works'.
> reports about paludis, would you?
This is why we discourage bugreports w/p prior contact on IRC.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Reply-To:'-munging:
I'm going to vote to keep it as is, and i don't think that anybody would
be able to convince me otherwise.
In regard to SPF: If klieber (or any other infra member) can explain to
me why SPF is a good thing(tm) to have for Gentoo Infrastructure, and
convince me t
eciate if Kurt could write up a short text which
explains why SPF is a good thing(TM) for Gentoo Infrastructure, so I
can understand it :-)
My vote would be: Remove, unless there is a real need for it. But this
could change rather quickly once Kurt (or anybody else from Infra) has
replied.
Danny
--
Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 16:07 schrieb Kurt Lieber:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:25:19PM +0100 or thereabouts, Danny van Dyk
wrote:
> > Kurt: Please write up a short text to explain why you think this is
> > necessary for Gentoo mailservers. Thanks in advance!
>
>
Hi,
besides a deprecated call to check_KV, matrox.eclass sets
SLOT=${KV}
which breaks the metadata cache. Any objections to change it
to
SLOT=0
anyone?
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
usually say yes,
* Mike usually says yes,
* you're aboard.
It's just that we don't have sufficient _active_ devs. :-/
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
tribute(d) to it, including
yourself ;-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Samstag, 17. Februar 2007 00:52 schrieb Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò:
> On Saturday 17 February 2007, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > a) It's _qualudis_ ;-)
>
> Whatever, can we get back on track?
>
> How much good did Google Summer of Code to the Gentoo _community_
27;s done, which is not now.
>
> Council- y'all were after getting this finished as far as I know,
> perhaps you could discuss intentions?
Why? There is work done on this, and there will be further work being
done. Several council member have access to it - including me - and
are quite
g
> reports if i remove custom-cflags use and also mplayer.
What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile?
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007 20:10 schrieb Stephen Bennett:
> Please welcome Richard to our ranks, or accuse him of being an evil
> cabalist (he works on Paludis, particularly maintaining its Ruby
> bindings), as you see fit.
Welcome aboard Richard!
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMA
out is intended to get multiple folks
> involved who each have their own specialized domain knowledge.
>
> For example, dismissing Chris when he's effectively the "profiles
> guy". Granted, can involve him afterwards, but don't much see the
> point in *not* doing it up front.
Read again, he did not dismiss Chris, he dismissed the claim that
Infrastructure should send somebody to discuss the package manager
standard.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2007 17:41 schrieb Brian Harring:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2007 14:26 schrieb Brian Harring:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 04:13:11AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > >
> part a legal structure to protect our collective work, (code, logos,
> etc.) and would be considered a third-party project.
>
> I'd be really surprised - flabbergasted, really - if this has
> changed. But at this point I almost wouldn't be surprised. :)
Suprise! :-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Samstag, 3. März 2007 19:48 schrieb Thomas Rösner:
> Hi,
>
> Danny van Dyk schrieb:
> > 2) There are countries who acutally adhere to the Berne Convention
> > (1886). This means even the deed of commiting sources with a
> > "Copyright (C) Gentoo Foundati
gt; ./trunk/general-concepts/install-destinations/text.xml:"${IMAGE}"<
>/c>.
>
> Can you corrent the devmanual then?
Done.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
grass/grass-6.2.0-r1.ebuild:111:
> sci-geosciences/mapserver/mapserver-4.10.0.ebuild:106:
> sci-misc/boinc/boinc-4.72.20050813-r3.ebuild:56:
> sci-misc/boinc/boinc-5.2.14.ebuild:57:
> sci-misc/boinc/boinc-5.4.11.ebuild:53:
> sci-misc/boinc/boinc-5.5.6.ebuild:59:
^^^ fixed as well.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
lplot/plplot-5.5.2.ebuild:
>use fortran && ! use ifc || if [ -z 'which g77' ]; then
> ./sci-visualization/xd3d/xd3d-8.2.1.ebuild:
>which g77 2> /dev/null || die "No GNU Fortran compiler found!"
^^^ fixed, too.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
x27; in eclasses and ebuilds.
>
> sci-mathematics/octave/octave-2.1.57-r1.ebuild:34:
> sci-mathematics/octave/octave-2.1.69.ebuild:36:
^^ fixed. Must have slipped through in my first round.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ly ebuild repositories.
This is what comes to my mind right now. The list is certainly not
complete :-)
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
should probably add a bullet point g) Hasn't looked yet.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
is FUD about forking
Gentoo. Paludis is not a fork of Gentoo, it's new package manager. The
relation between Portage and Paludis can, if at all, probably be
compared to dselect vs apt.
Don't reply to this mail, just let it drop. Thank you very much.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ike any privacy
in that at all. vapier comes to my mind there :-D
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
gentoo ebuild
devs*) either with lists of QA problems in the tree to fix, or with
tools that enable you to search for one particular (kind of) QA
violation in the whole tree, whatever your prefer.
Danny
*I'm only adressing gentoo devs here as patches against the whole tree
don't make sen
see.
>
> another one i had mentioned earlier:
> - a time frame on moving gentoo-core to public archives ... two
> years ? -mike
What happened to 1 year?
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
