Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-16 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 10 14:16:47, grob...@gentoo.org wrote: > On 09-01-2017 09:08:22 +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > The particular problem I am having is that http://mdocml.bsd.lv/ , > > my manpage formatter of choice, does deliberately not support bzip > > (or any other outside decompre

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-11 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 11 13:34:09, sven.e...@gmx.de wrote: > Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2017, 13:36:15 CET schrieb Jan Stary: > > > You arguing that 40MB is nothing on modern systems (which, by the way is > > > not exactly true, talking about embedded ones). > > > > Can you gove

[gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-09 Thread Jan Stary
This is Gentoo 2.2 (4.4.6-gentoo x86_64). The system manpages seem to be bzipped as in /usr/share/man/man1/ls.1.bz2 Why is that? Is there any benefit to compressing the manpages nowadays? IMHO it only adds a layer of complexity, for very questionable benefit (i.e. disk space): how much of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 10 19:19:03, gen...@mva.name wrote: > В письме от вторник, 10 января 2017 г. 13:08:14 +07 пользователь Jan Stary > написал: > > On Jan 10 19:04:47, gen...@mva.name wrote: > > > > There is an option to support; the packages need to be reinstalled > > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 10 12:54:21, h...@stare.cz wrote: > Also, the uncompressed manpage will not get updated > when the packages gets updated. I will have two copies, > a stale *.1 and an up-to-date *.1.bz2. And things like /usr/share/man/man1/sx.1.bz2 will not get unbzipped, because it's a symlink, now

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 10 19:04:47, gen...@mva.name wrote: > > There is an option to support; the packages need to be reinstalled > > or there are untracked files; the manpage formatter needs to call > > external unpackers. All this to save 40M. I honestly don't think > > it's worth it. > > Why do you care about

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 09 09:30:11, ike...@gentoo.org wrote: > Hiya Jan, > > The following snippet from Ingo is correct: > > > So, you want to hear something constructive? Your best option is to > > just decompress that stuff on your system. (Gentoo is famous for > > its excessive configurability - maybe

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-10 Thread Jan Stary
> > This is Gentoo 2.2 (4.4.6-gentoo x86_64). > > That doesn't actually tell any Gentoo user anything about your system > except a very specific few bits of data which do not relate at all to > the rest of the subject matter of your e-mail. I am not really familiar eith this system - what would