On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:44:41 +0100
George Shapovalov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. 2005 stands for the standard revision namme (as in Ada 2005)
really rather than for a particular version.
To elaborate for those unfamiliar with Ada; this is the same sort of
thing as C89, C99. Enforcing the
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:33:02 -0500
solar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:56 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
DEBUG_CFLAGS=DEBUG_CXXFLAGS=-O -g
Mike,
how about
DEBUG_CFLAGS=DEBUG_CXXFLAGS=-O -g -fno-stack-protector -fno-pie
It's enough to do LDFLAGS=-nopie to get debuggable
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:28:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 19 January 2006 18:52, Mark Loeser wrote:
Please lets avoid this assumption. I'd love to make it so we never
make this assumption anywhere in the tree so that we could actually
build GCC without pie or
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100
Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please find attached GLEP 47: Creating 'safe' environment variables.
Could you add a definition of 'safe' to the GLEP? It's not clear what
this means at the moment.
--
Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:13:46 +0100
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their
own category?
Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be
resolved, moving packages around should be avoided. We've
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:30:50 -0600
R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
232 matches. http://tinyurl.com/pmrmx
The vast majority of which have an explanation in the comment
directly preceding.
In which case it's a moment's effort to cut-n-paste the text into the
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:47:33 -0500
solar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forget where I read it but I thought that unicode lead to overflows
and was considered a general security risk. I wish I knew where I read
that but I'm unable to find it.
Well, stuff I could find includes:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:54:25 +
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 00:41 +, Roy Marples wrote:
For the non technically minded folks whats the difference between
-fno-stack-protector and -fno-stack-protector-all?
[...]
It was explained to me like this:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:58:03 +0100
Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During that discussion we realized that having utf-8 not enabled by
default and no utf8 fonts available by default causes lots of
recompilation and reconfiguration.
Enabling the unicode useflag in the profiles should
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:31:34 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I don't know darcs at all in terms of use and feature, I
would really suggest to _not_ use it. For a simple reason, actually:
cvs has almost no cost added, as it's present on every major
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:46:58 +
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 12:42 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
This is a valid issue, as ghc is only supplied upstream for linux
(some older versions available in mingw32).
I don't think this is right. All
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:37:45 +
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 13:32 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:46:58 +
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 12:42 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:03:00 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see some clarification of intended doc use flag usage
From what I've gleaned over time, USE=doc is supposed to enable docs
that are one or more of:
(1) large
(2) take a significant amount of resource to build
(3)
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:29:32 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To that end, it's been brought up that perhaps the metadata.xml files
are partly to blame, in that they imply that the package is maintained
by a herd. There is not maintainer-team listed, just a herd.
So, I would
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:27:12 -0400
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 09:22 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
I must admit I've assumed that the herd entry in metadata.xml is a
reasonable fall-back if the maintainer entry is missing or the
listed maintainer
OK; just to clarify my understanding, and perhaps for anyone else
watching who saw things as muddled as I did:
1) A herd is a group of packages, no more, no less. A package must be a
member of at least one herd (since the herd entry is mandatory in
metadata.xml, and metadata.xml is mandatory).
On Thu, 04 May 2006 16:29:56 -0700
Michael Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This leads to people trying to maintain a
frankenstinian /etc/portage/package.keywords file, constantly adding
to it and never knowing when things can be removed from it.
If you use specific versions in the
On Thu, 4 May 2006 21:20:48 -0500
spradlim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question that I havn't been able to find that is somewhat
related to the following email. I know and understand Linux very
well. I also know how ebuilds work. So how do I go about maintaining
packages and getting
On Fri, 5 May 2006 13:20:09 +0200
Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 May 2006 08:32, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
If you use specific versions in the package.keywords file (i.e. do
=category/package-version-revision ~arch instead of
category/package ~arch, this doesn't
On Fri, 5 May 2006 16:38:57 +0200
Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 05 May 2006 15:23, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
I disagree. Your argument is for not using ~arch at all, rather
than an argument against keeping control of what you have from
~arch.
No. My argument
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:49:22 +0200
Simon Strandman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed modular X on my server running hardened.
X on a server? If it's just for the libs that's ok, but running the X
server itself is risky on a server as it's huge and suid so flaws can
easily gain root access.
On Sat, 13 May 2006 11:32:49 +0200
Simon Strandman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) skrev:
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:49:22 +0200
Simon Strandman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed modular X on my server running hardened.
X on a server? If it's just for the libs that's
On Sat, 13 May 2006 13:10:22 -0700
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
This was handled in the 6.8.x series and got dropped for unknown
reasons when the modular X porting started happening.
Unless your dead set on modular X I'd stick with the 6.8.x series.
We are
On Sat, 13 May 2006 23:04:10 -0700
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
Oh, OK, let's argue semantics. It's suggested by a hardened user on a
bug the hardened team is CC'd on, but the team didn't say anything was
wrong with the change.
That's because
On Sun, 14 May 2006 12:46:23 +0200
Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea of filter-ldflags is a bad one, IMO. There are an infinite
number of ways to enable a flag (for -z now: -Wl,-z,now;
-Wl,-z -Wl,now; -Xlinker -z -Xlinker -now; -Wl,-O1,-z,now; ...). Even
if you restrict
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 19:56:41 -0500
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 23:32 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
so we've found some cases where a package installs objects that
either need to be ignored by some of the scanelf checks ...
...
what this e-mail is about is
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:46:25 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 05 March 2006 19:48, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
This could be done via the profiles, perhaps - package.qa, something
like package.mask/use/keywords:
i hate such things ... imo this information should
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 00:17:52 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how does the attached patch look ? it allows for regexes in the
ignore list which is why i used gawk ;)
Could we add something so that we can disable these ignore lists in the
hardened profile? At least something like:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:50:00 -0600
MIkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add the capability for emerge to take a category as an argument,
# (cd ${PORTDIR_OVERLAY} emerge -pv category/*)
Then the user can create overlays with their own category names and
symlink in the package directories they want
29 matches
Mail list logo
