Re: [gentoo-dev] Parallizing ebuilds - 'trivial' ebuilds

2006-01-16 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Philippe Trottier wrote: Recipe for disaster, specially in a place like mine where sparc, alpha, x86_64 and ppc32/64 mix... not counting ia64 for a test run soon... If you really want to do this, someone has to make a rendezvous a la Apple. Where not only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Improving Gentoo User Relations

2006-04-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Jakub Moc wrote: I bet there's a bug open for it. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482 . How's portage 2.1 getting along? I notice it gets frequent updates. The gentoo-portage-dev list is the place to follow this. Also,

Re: [gentoo-dev] User support system

2006-08-23 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Alec Warner wrote: On the plus side it would be much easier to find duplicate bugs since the titles would be uniform. I think this is an interesting point. I'd like to have something like a specialised bug system for ebuilds, where you have to enter the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 17.12.2012 11:23, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 17/12/2012 11:19, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never bothered enough how to make world and config files to be put elsewhere :P). I would say

[gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages

2009-05-25 Thread Philipp Riegger
Good morning, I want to talk about improved binary package support for Gentoo. About 1-2 months ago there already was a discussion about this on gentoo-soc@ and on bugzilla [1]. If I remember correctly, there were no devs involved in the discussion, so I thought I'll post my thoughts here. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages

2009-05-26 Thread Philipp Riegger
Hi Duncan, I don't see the connection between the email Fabio wrote and your answer. Do you want to say, that you agree that he's doing what i described and that it works the way i described it? I doubt it. If you really care, could you answer my first email and state there the problems you see

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages

2009-05-26 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 11:27 +0200, lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Philipp Riegger li...@anderedomain.de wrote: And all this layer thing Fabio was talking about. I did not try it and I did not read the code, but I think it makes things much more complicated

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages

2009-05-26 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 08:48 +, Duncan wrote: Philipp Riegger li...@anderedomain.de posted 1243321504.9661.14.ca...@hspc30.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de, excerpted below, on Tue, 26 May 2009 09:05:03 +0200: I don't see the connection between the email Fabio wrote and your answer. Do

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Philipp Riegger
Hello world! On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:24 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category (eselect itself would stay in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-28 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:17:41 +0100 Beber be...@meleeweb.net wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 tcpdump USE=+chroot +ipv6 -ssl -test -samba -smi is placed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-29 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:31:04 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: But if you built and linked against openssl-0.9.7*, then upgraded to openssl-0.9.8, you can expect breakage. But can't this be kind of ignored and solves the Gentoo way? If the binpkg does not work, don't install it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by trapni need a co-maintainer

2012-04-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:24:25 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/14/2012 02:16 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to add to metadata if you want. Thanks: dev-util/ciabot-svn media-sound/teamspeak-client-bin

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: upgrading to postfix-2.9

2012-07-17 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 17.07.2012 16:49, Michael Orlitzky wrote: After changing these for years, I finally realized that the defaults are correct: # postconf -d readme_directory html_directory readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.8.9/readme html_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.8.9/html Do we

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Christian Marie (pingu)

2006-12-21 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 19.12.2006, at 12:07, Mark Kowarsky wrote: We are currently dominating the southern hemisphere (with our army of 5), but world domination is still a very distant prospect. But lot's of world dominations started with domination in australia. So don't give up. :-) Philipp --

Re: [gentoo-dev] tr1 dependencies

2007-01-30 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 30.01.2007, at 09:36, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch to | system on at configure time as done for other libs? At something like five megs of code per application? If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like minimal? Philipp --

Re: [gentoo-dev] tr1 dependencies

2007-01-30 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 30.01.2007, at 11:40, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | | * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch | | to system on at configure time as done for other libs? | | At something like five megs of code per application? | | If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like

Re: [gentoo-dev] tests

2007-05-02 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 02.05.2007, at 02:32, Marius Mauch wrote: a) cost (in terms of runtime, resource usage, additional deps) Tools for this could be implemented in the package manager. The package has to be installed and tested by the developer, so if portage would show the times for each stage or the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Pending death of mail-filter/spamassassin-ruledujour

2007-08-03 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:48 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: It's not a vulnerability in Rules du Jour. It's a bunch of spammers attacking the Rules du Jour servers and ISP. SARE has also been down a whole bunch over the last couple of months due to the same attack. Which will probably never happen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality

2007-08-03 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:06 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: So, what do you guys think? One problem i see is changing versions in the tree but not puting the changes to the wip ebuilds in an overlay or somewhere else. Is there a system to email any changes done to ebuilds maintained by developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality

2007-08-03 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 01:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: So, what do you guys think? One problem i see is changing versions in the tree but not puting the changes to the wip ebuilds in an overlay or somewhere else. Is there a system to email any changes done to ebuilds maintained by

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK

2007-08-31 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 18:13 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote: I find the persisten-net-generator.rules particularly annoying (for various reasons including, but not limited to system images and system cloning). So I have an empty file of that name and happily nuke whatever comes along with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing users and groups

2007-09-09 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 06:14 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: A group/user is created when no other ebuild has the dependency and is removed when the last ebuild has been removed which needs it? This blows up if you have to uninstall and reinstall a package, caused by blockers or whatever. Files

Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits

2011-03-27 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:04:56 -0500 Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote: this is especially important for the people doing arch keywording since they make a ton of commits. i'm looking at you armin76. One thing I don't get amidst this whole conversation is why I should sign a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-14 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote: We have a new cache format, confcache, parallel fetch, etc... The bonus is these features are already mature and relatively old ( a year + as of now ). Reading about confcache i have one question: When i saw, that this feature exists (in

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Apr 15, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Duncan wrote: Wouldn't the help them out default be consistent with the non-interactive goal for portage? Quit if there's no sane way to go forward without potentially breaking a system, but otherwise, use sane fallbacks where they are possible. I don't think

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-19 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote: But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even if i have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i have emerged confcache and, if i have

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Portage phase hooks patch

2006-07-26 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: If the main issue is cleaning up after an abort, perhaps it would be useful to add a pkg_abort() phase to the package manager; then that can be implemented in an eclass. But i think this could be a problem when FEATURES=keepwork or

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Masked by corruption

2007-01-11 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 02.01.2007, at 06:56, Zac Medico wrote: In =portage-2.1.2_rc4-r2 t does that now for installed package (see bug #158931). For /var/cache/edb/dep the sqlite module is available (requires pysqlite or python-2.5 with sqlite support enabled). Where can i find documentation about this? I use

[gentoo-portage-dev] Portage color.map settings

2009-08-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
Hi! Given the following portage output: troy ~ # USE=examples emerge -pv python --- Invalid atom in /usr/portage/local/layman/dev-zero/profiles/package.mask: =dev-libs/boost-log-scm These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ]

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage color.map settings

2009-08-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:05:05 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: With =portage-2.2_rc34, this patch is included: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274279 With that you can do things like yellow=darkblue and green=darkgreen. Thanks a lot, this works great. Philipp