h*
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88596
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 16:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 10 April 2005 11:31 am, Spider wrote:
> > A touch late, but this uncovered a bug in libtool.
>
> re-emerge libtool and it'll fix itself
Yep, I know that.
Unfortunately, thats -not- going to be a "
gt; it.
>
> Are you gonna start a poll on the forums?
*BANG*
oops, sorry. Lots of us don't use forums or other web-based half-uis
that do not support content delivery and control in local and orderly
fashion :)
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See
> He's been quite busy with J2EE and has 5 year consultancy track in
> that technology.
I feel for you. What do you do to recover? ;)
>
> Please welcome him as usual
>
Sure, the goats are that way *points to the vend-a-goat machine*.
Sacrifices will commence shortly.
less you have another editor as binary built into your shell,
don't remove ed. A "trusted" editor is good. Sash is seldom used for
"My system is haxxored" however its often used for "I fucked up glibc"
and an editor is a handy thing, even if its as obscure as "
e foot because of this.
btw, both ed and bc is used in a lot of configure scripts, more than I
care to remember ( I believe that things like enlightenment had calls to
it...) so replacing this involves you doing a very massive regression
test. Have fun.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured
ice list of packages that are actually used.
So, I know it isn't foolproof, don't expect it to be. However, feedback
would be nice, patches and so on.
oh, where it lives? cvs : gentoo/users/spider/depreverse , expects to
be ran from the current directory as it calls "
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 14:21 +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:32 +0200
> Spider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, I know it isn't foolproof, don't expect it to be. However,
> > feedback would be nice, patches and so on.
greni.free.fr/gentoo/galeon.ps
>
> I'm not sure it's really useful, but oh well, it was worth writing
> to learn dot's very basics :)
Hehe, Rather cool, but the diagram is a bit hard to get an overview of.
Though, I recognise the reason for doing it :)
Thanks ,
Spider
dd a logrotate config file to sys-power/acpid.
>
> Sincerely,
> Brix
-1 from me.. Make it default to on and install the files. its minimal
overhead and can be toggled to be disabled with the "minimal" USE flag,
Just avoiding pollution...
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:11 -0500, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
>
> So, please join me in a hearty Welcome Back for Michael Cummings.
Yey! Great news :)
//Spider ,
Who's too fed up with bureaucrazy to willingly submit himself to
devrel. :-)
--
begin .signature
Tortured users /
e parts that the
maintainers consider "good and reasonable"
I know one place where I'd love to see this is fex. the various
multimedia backends, openssl/gnutls among other such settings.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article
s-apps/portage/portage-2.0.53_rc7-prepstrip.patch
> It requires you merge pax-utils for the scanelf util.
>
I would certainly like this as on by default, and controlled via
INSTALL_MASK rather than a FEATURE.
(Although I'd have to rebuild my complete system, since I do have it all
with debu
core systems.
So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it
be worth the time spent on this?
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more inform
performance test setup here. If
anyone has ideas for a decent test, I'd be happy.
As for KDE, I think modern Gnome would benefit as well, since it has
been heavily refactioned into libraries these days.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Arti
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 02:29 +0100, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been looking some at Michael Meeks -Bdirect patches, and the
> possible performance boost they could give.
>
> The good parts here is that it seems to be far less intrusive for the
> running
running out of sync.
This situation may be fixed now, but I'm more likely to believe that it
just hasn't cropped up "Just yet" ( yep, I'm cynical here )
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 20:40 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 19:29, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
> > How will you deal with the packages that build against glibc iconv but
> > not against the separated?
> I'll patch them, if the
l, but still)
Mercurial, last I checked, was still rather fragile. Fast, decent, but
fragile. :(
svn I haven't tried, actually. Although in current terms, it seems to be
a good replacement from how we work and what we do with things.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
we've been let down on it in the past,
had it postponed to "the great redesign" ( project baghira, I think,
too) And so on.
Suffice to say, we're still waiting, but more content to hack around and
break the build process theese days.
(finally we can kill use_with !! )
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 10:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 01:35, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:06 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:53:14 +0100 Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 21:49 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 21:17, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> >
> > No, what you suggested was that for the case of when you depend on a
> > SLOT, then the tree is flattened. My point was for the generic case :
>
riteria).
And, I'm not sure just how this mangling would look when expanded in the
installed package database, can you elaborate a bit?
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
poppler blocks against -older- versions of xpdf, not against
"current" ones, so start by removing xpdf, upgrading poppler, then
re-install xpdf and you should be fine.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
ilds against the current -stable- tree or
the current ~ tree for various architectures?
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
c without C++ support
> -mike
Yes. And that is as intended with -*.
Really, Don't refuse an idea because this. Having IUSE="cxx" USE="-*"
and getting -cxx is expected behaviour.
Not having a C++ compiler might be just exactly what they want,
right? :)
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Welcome aboard, We don't bite.. Much.
(usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
those of lu_zero ;)
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 16:12 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2005 15:03, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
> > (usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
> > those of lu_zero ;)
> Strange that I'm still arou
't be broken for use in compile.
Runtime isn't only executables.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
aders in turn, in order to get the
dependencies right.
The other is to fix the level closest to the breakage by making sure
that headers are treated like libraries.
Hope I'm making this clear enough, its fairly early.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 22:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
> | Why? Because they just install the hard RDEPEND, so if you have a system
> | installed from binaries, you get working linking
or h in HOMEPAGE ; do firefox "$h" & ;
> done , which works just fine in multiple and blank homepage cases...
I agree with Ciaran here. exporting the explicitly empty variable is a
good thing. If, however the variable is unset completely, then we have
an issue of laziness on
32 matches
Mail list logo
