[gentoo-dev] CPU use flag detection

2013-05-15 Thread yac
Hi, I was recently investigating what cpu flags do I have and how does it work. I have put what I have so far at [1]. So I thought I let you know in case someone wants to chip in. [1] https://github.com/yaccz/cufd

[gentoo-dev] repoman warning on python data_files

2013-06-08 Thread yac
Hi I have just noticed that if package is using relative paths in:: setup.py data_files = ... Then the files are installed right into /usr in case of CPython (The exact dest is determined by sys.prefix) So, I'm thinking it could be worthwhile to add a warning to repoman if package is using

Re: TLDR: rant in support of overlays (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays)

2013-06-13 Thread yac
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:31:57 -0700 Greg Turner g...@malth.us wrote: Anyhow, isn't the gentoo-x86 tree already plenty big enough, without every single overlay's ebuilds and eclasses in there too? Personally, I'm inclined to wish it was smaller, even if that meant more stuff was pushed into

[gentoo-dev] New eclass - twisted-r1

2013-07-10 Thread yac
Hello everypony In order to bump dev-python/twisted packages to EAPI=5 we also need to bump the twisted eclass to use distutils-r1. I have made this bump (to the eclass and dev-python/twisted*) packages in my yac overlay [1] You can view the actuall changes at [2]. It's merely the existing

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass - twisted-r1

2013-07-10 Thread yac
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:25:50 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: First of all: please wrap lines at 72 or 80 chars (even if the original eclass didn't do that). if [[ ${CATEGORY}/${PN} == dev-python/twisted* ]]; then I know you're not responsible for this but it seems wrong to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass - twisted-r1

2013-07-11 Thread yac
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:55:47 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2013-07-10, o godz. 23:40:11 yac y...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:25:50 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: First of all: please wrap lines at 72 or 80 chars (even

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass - twisted-r1

2013-07-11 Thread yac
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:25:50 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: python_test() { # TODO: this seems to be used only in dev-python/twisted-* packages as # dev-python/twisted-13.0.0 have it's own src_test if [[ ${CATEGORY}/${PN} != dev-python/twisted* ]]; then

[gentoo-dev] New eclass: twisted-r1

2013-07-26 Thread yac
too. Will commit tomorrow if there are no disputers. [1] https://github.com/yaccz/gentoo-overlay/commit/1288b7989a156d3e9c3b6b1a0f079c33c9dffc10 commit 1288b7989a156d3e9c3b6b1a0f079c33c9dffc10 Author: Jan (yac) Matějka jmate...@suse.cz Date: Mon Jul 8 13:57:23 2013 +0200 eapi 5/twisted-r1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Autobuilds go to /experimental and to /releases only when someone actually tests them

2013-07-27 Thread yac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:13:37 -0400 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/27/2013 12:08 AM, Matt Turner wrote: (I sent this to gentoo-releng@. Resending to gentoo-dev@ for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-07-29 Thread yac
I have fully encrypted systems, including /, which requires an initramfs with cryptsetup built staticaly. On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:57:58 +0200 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello As discussed at: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478476 Upstream is dropping static libs from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking of deprecated USE flags

2013-08-09 Thread yac
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 18:40:39 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote: Some people want that repoman print warnings for ebuilds, whose effective IUSE contains deprecated USE flags (e.g. USE flags corresponding to old versions of Python/Ruby). I suggest that

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving COLLISION_IGNORE (and UNINSTALL_IGNORE?) to profiles/*/make.defaults

2013-08-12 Thread yac
There should not be a collision of the dropin.cache in the first place. By adding the cache files to COLLISION_IGNORE it will just hide the collision problem and create other one (with obsolette caches), harder to debug. On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:19:59 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-10-02 Thread yac
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:12:00 +1300 Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 October 2013 08:51, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: I agree, but I think the problem is basically that many people consider it impossible for newer to ever be shitty. Even if they are intimately familiar

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: converting /etc/mtab to a symlink

2013-10-13 Thread yac
AFAIK this known historical behavior that what you find in `/etc/mtab` are things mounted by mount(8) (if that's what's printed by running just mount). Whereas /proc/mounts is the kernel view on what's mounted. Curiously I don't see any difference on my gentoo box, which I think I should see but

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: user-developer/privileges in IRC

2013-10-22 Thread yac
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:02:29 +0400 Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote: 22.10.2013 07:19, Peter Stuge пишет: I should have included bugzilla among mailing lists+IRC, users can indeed also have elevated privileges on IRC, but never equal to developers. It is radical exclusion and I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Scire project - plans?

2013-10-30 Thread yac
You know there are already projects like cfengine and puppet that seems to be way ahead. Also most of the links on the project page are not working anymore. On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:25:19 -0700 Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:15 +0400, Sergey Popov wrote: Hello,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-arch/xarchiver

2013-11-02 Thread yac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I don't think that upstream deciding to rewrite a package is good enough reason to tree clean the package. Have you done this with eg. bind package which is constantly rewritten and constantly have security issues? The same goes for closing bugs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-arch/xarchiver

2013-11-02 Thread yac
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 17:57:34 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/02/2013 05:55 PM, yac wrote: Hi, I don't think that upstream deciding to rewrite a package is good enough reason to tree clean the package. Have you done this with eg. bind package which is constantly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-02 Thread yac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:20:41 -0400 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2013 11:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-11-02, o godz. 14:51:26 Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-02 Thread yac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:57:07 -0400 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2013 04:35 PM, yac wrote: On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:20:41 -0400 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-02 Thread yac
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 19:19:21 -0400 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/02/2013 06:09 PM, yac wrote: I don't know how this releng stuff works. I bet there is lot of devs who don't. This is why you should announce risking commits. Because you may not know what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-03 Thread yac
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:02:31 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/11/2013 01:45, yac wrote: On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 19:19:21 -0400 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/02/2013 06:09 PM, yac wrote: I don't know how this releng stuff works. I bet

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-03 Thread yac
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 10:53:13 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/11/2013 17:03, Michał Górny wrote: I was considering writing a news item for it but we discussed it on IRC and decided that users are really expected to be able to handle themselves, especially wrt to:

Official way to do rolling update (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec)

2013-11-03 Thread yac
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:02:31 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] Afaik there is no official way to update gentoo, is there? It's always been emerge -avuND world [snip] Is this documented annywhere? I have a hard time finding it. I can see it mentioned eg. in man

Official way to do rolling update (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec)

2013-11-03 Thread yac
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:02:31 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] Afaik there is no official way to update gentoo, is there? It's always been emerge -avuND world [snip] Is this documented annywhere? I have a hard time finding it. I can see it mentioned eg. in man

Re: Official way to do rolling update (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec)

2013-11-03 Thread yac
Please do not reply to this thread. I've resent the mail without the thread context header. On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 01:59:19 +0100 yac y...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:02:31 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] Afaik there is no official way to update

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Official way to do rolling update (Was: Re: Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec)

2013-11-04 Thread yac
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:51:32 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Daniel Campbell posted on Mon, 04 Nov 2013 02:50:27 -0600 as excerpted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/03/2013 10:15 PM, yac wrote: On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:02:31 +0200 Alan McKinnon

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

2013-11-06 Thread yac
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:48:54 +0100 Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 10:15 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: However, it's been a long-standing general practise that if there are no deps in the tree older than what is necessary for a package, that package doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

2013-11-06 Thread yac
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:22:13 -0500 Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: On 06/11/13 12:56 PM, yac wrote: On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:48:54 +0100 Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 10:15

[gentoo-dev] Local Gentoo User Group community support

2013-11-15 Thread yac
Hi What does Gentoo Linux provide for $SUBJ? I know there are mailing lists like gentoo-user-lang. Is there anything else? --- Jan Matějka| Gentoo Developer https://gentoo.org | Gentoo Linux GPG: A33E F5BC A9F6 DAFD 2021 6FB6 3EBF D45B EEB6 CA8B signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not

2013-12-07 Thread yac
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:32:09 +0900 hero...@gentoo.org wrote: Dear all, I have only one python-2.7 on my system. Simple and stupid. After boost ebuild is converted to python-r1, libboost_python.so is renamed to libboost_python-2.7.so. This is all cool about python-r1 for multiple python

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer-needed on many of my packages

2013-12-31 Thread yac
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:31:47 +0100 Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote: Le dimanche 29 décembre 2013 à 00:19 +, Robin H. Johnson a écrit : sys-apps/vbetool Is this still remotely useful with KMS-enabled kernels ? I believe so. I have used it recently to control the LVDS backlight when

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage QOS

2014-01-09 Thread yac
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:24:25 +0400 LTHR lanthrus...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, What do you think about implementing this: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7477494 I've system design in my head and could write it down with the implementation details. Then may be we could all review

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git

2014-02-10 Thread yac
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:33:27 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: Ahoi, I've been looking for a clean git-converted gentoo-x86 repo for ... well ... mostly data mining as cvs / anoncvs.g.o is too slow for some things. While you are it, it would be great if you could get some

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-10 Thread yac
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:48:17 -0500 Emery Hemingway em...@vfemail.net wrote: I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is interested in a Go project. I might be. I have packaged something for private

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-14 Thread yac
my email didn't go out for some reason. As the primary go maintainer, I do want to be involved in this. :-) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:38:44AM +0100, yac wrote: On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:48:17 -0500 Emery Hemingway em...@vfemail.net wrote: I really like working

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-19 Thread yac
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:44:09 -0600 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:48:44AM +0100, yac wrote: On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:02:49 -0500 Emery Hemingway em...@vfemail.net wrote: The default GOROOT that go looks at for base libraries seems to be compiled in so

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-26 Thread yac
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:31:45 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:03:08 +0100 Jan Matejka y...@gentoo.org wrote: No, categories are essentially directories. fixed: categories are essentially also directories. Also? No, categories are *essentially*

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-28 Thread yac
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:39:06 +1300 Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 03:55, Damien Levac damien.le...@gmail.com wrote: A lot of people already replied to this question: package search. A trivial example, a user want to know all terminals available in portage.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-28 Thread yac
yac y...@gentoo.org wrote: What I was describing is the difference between fundamental properties of categories and tags. You are trying to redefine categories in terms of a concept that they didn't originally represent. No one's redefining anything. You seem awfully fixated