Hi,
R0b0t1 writes:
> I have seen similar choices made before, but this is the first time I
> have seen a good case for the choice you selected. E.g.:
>
> (Current.)
> *>
>*=>
> *==>
> *===>
Erm.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:23 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Hello, and my apologies for missing your message.
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Benda Xu wrote:
>> Hi R0b0t1,
>>
>> R0b0t1 writes:
>>
>>> I don't want to just comment on naming, but:
>>>
>>> It might be more natural to go the other w
Hello, and my apologies for missing your message.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi R0b0t1,
>
> R0b0t1 writes:
>
>> I don't want to just comment on naming, but:
>>
>> It might be more natural to go the other way. Split profiles off based
>> on version when breakage occurs, an
Hi Patrice,
Patrice Clement writes:
> Thanks for the work.
>
> Could you also consider adding a Prefix profile compatible with
> FreeBSD?
We have supported BSD before. But at the moment, no one on the Prefix
team have access to BSD hosts.
Historically, fauli has developped Prefix on FreeBSD
Hi Benda
Monday 08 Jan 2018 15:38:49, Benda Xu wrote :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to introduce some 17.0 profile for Prefix. It also
> introduces separate profiles to support different ranges of linux
> kernels.
>
> | name | linux| glibc |
> |--+-
Hi R0b0t1,
R0b0t1 writes:
> I don't want to just comment on naming, but:
>
> It might be more natural to go the other way. Split profiles off based
> on version when breakage occurs, and otherwise do not reference a
> specific version.
>
> Then, the name indicates the most recent kernel supporte
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi MJ,
>
> "M. J. Everitt" writes:
>
>> Not entirely as a #gentoo-nit-pick .. I'm slightly unclear on the
>> different between 2.6.16+ and 2.6.32+ .. should this potentially be
>> 2.16.16-32 perhaps [2.6.16~32 even] or is this more obvious only to
On 11/01/18 03:18, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi MJ,
>
> "M. J. Everitt" writes:
>
>> Not entirely as a #gentoo-nit-pick .. I'm slightly unclear on the
>> different between 2.6.16+ and 2.6.32+ .. should this potentially be
>> 2.16.16-32 perhaps [2.6.16~32 even] or is this more obvious only to me,
>> and mo
Hi MJ,
"M. J. Everitt" writes:
> Not entirely as a #gentoo-nit-pick .. I'm slightly unclear on the
> different between 2.6.16+ and 2.6.32+ .. should this potentially be
> 2.16.16-32 perhaps [2.6.16~32 even] or is this more obvious only to me,
> and more confusing to others
2.6.16+ means tha
On 10/01/18 14:00, kuzetsa wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 08:21 AM, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>> On January 8, 2018 9:39:47 PM EST, Benda Xu wrote:
>>> Hi kuzetsa,
>>>
>>> kuzetsa writes:
>>>
The term "beyond" feels wrong & confusing.
(Not sure what to replace it with though)
>>> How about this?
>>>
On 01/09/2018 08:21 AM, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>
> On January 8, 2018 9:39:47 PM EST, Benda Xu wrote:
>> Hi kuzetsa,
>>
>> kuzetsa writes:
>>
>>> The term "beyond" feels wrong & confusing.
>>> (Not sure what to replace it with though)
>> How about this?
>>
>> default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/pr
On January 8, 2018 9:39:47 PM EST, Benda Xu wrote:
>Hi kuzetsa,
>
>kuzetsa writes:
>
>> The term "beyond" feels wrong & confusing.
>> (Not sure what to replace it with though)
>
>How about this?
>
> default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-3.2+
> default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib
Hi Aaron,
Aaron Bauman writes:
> I am not too familair with prefix other than the purpose of it (e.g. I
> have never built it), but is there a better naming standard for the
> profiles? I understand the need to distinguish between the kernel and
> glibc versions.
> Is there a standard I am miss
Hi kuzetsa,
kuzetsa writes:
> The term "beyond" feels wrong & confusing.
> (Not sure what to replace it with though)
How about this?
default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-3.2+
default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-2.6.32+
default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/pre
On Monday, January 8, 2018 1:38:49 AM EST Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to introduce some 17.0 profile for Prefix. It also
> introduces separate profiles to support different ranges of linux
> kernels.
>
> | name | linux| glibc |
> |
> |
On 01/08/2018 01:38 AM, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to introduce some 17.0 profile for Prefix. It also
> introduces separate profiles to support different ranges of linux
> kernels.
>
> | name | linux| glibc |
> |--+--+
Hi,
I would like to introduce some 17.0 profile for Prefix. It also
introduces separate profiles to support different ranges of linux
kernels.
| name | linux| glibc |
|--+--+---|
| beyond-kernel-2.6.16 | [2.6.16, 2.6.32) |
17 matches
Mail list logo
