On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 00:07:13 +0100
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> Any better?
I think I would be personally aided by a description of what sort of
environment is expecting the various values, eg:
I know if I build for a target that I'll eventually have to "chroot" to
get into, paths that get "made con
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 16:27:22 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > What I am trying to say (somewhat unsuccessfully!) is that the value
> > of (E)SYSROOT only changes how the package is built, not what the
> > resulting package looks like. It's where all the headers and libraries
> > are sourced from a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:40:19 +0100
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:51:58 +0200
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 23:26:27 +0100
> > James Le Cuirot wrote:
> >
> > > > Admittedly without a full understanding of th
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:40:19 +0100
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> So why does ROOT affect it? Normally you install the packages for
> BDEPEND, DEPEND, and RDEPEND to the same location. If BDEPEND and
> RDEPEND are installed to different locations (ROOT!=/) then DEPEND will
> almost always be installed
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:51:58 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 23:26:27 +0100
> James Le Cuirot wrote:
>
> > > Admittedly without a full understanding of the problem, but this
> > > looks wrong to me: SYSROOT, EPREFIX and BROOT are only relevant in
> > > build phases (src_*); (E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 23:26:27 +0100
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > Admittedly without a full understanding of the problem, but this
> > looks wrong to me: SYSROOT, EPREFIX and BROOT are only relevant in
> > build phases (src_*); (EPREFIX is a little spe
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:05:10 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> There seems to be unneeded whitespace only changes here that make the
> diff less readable
Sorry about that. I've only changed one cell in that table.
> Admittedly without a full understanding of the problem, but this looks
> wrong to m
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 22:37:35 +0100
James Le Cuirot wrote:
[...]
> -& \t{BDEPEND} &
> \t{DEPEND} & \t{RDEPEND}, \t{PDEPEND} \\
> +& \t{BDEPEND} &
> \t{DEPEND}& \t{RDEPEND}, \t{PDEPEND} \\
> \mid
It was originally envisaged (but not stated in PMS) that SYSROOT would
only ever need to equal / or ROOT as a distinct SYSROOT would have no
benefit. A check was added to Portage to ensure this held. Myself, the
ChromiumOS team, and others have since been caught out by this check
when trying to boo
