[gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-13 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:22:54 -0700: Steve Long wrote: Duncan wrote: Steve Dibb posted: there is more than one mp3 encoder. [S]houldn't the description mention that? How about: Prefer using LAME for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-13 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 10:37 +, Duncan wrote: Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:22:54 -0700: Steve Long wrote: Duncan wrote: Steve Dibb posted: there is more than one mp3 encoder. [S]houldn't the

[gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-12 Thread Steve Long
Duncan wrote: Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600: The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than one mp3 encoder. In almost every case of the use flag being applied above, there is already

[gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-12 Thread Duncan
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:26:12 +0100: In that case, shouldn't the description mention that? Something like: MP3 encoding support using LAME (as opposed to ffmpeg) What about when the next one gets added-- would it need

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-12 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Long wrote: Duncan wrote: Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600: The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than one mp3 encoder. In almost

[gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-12 Thread Duncan
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:35:30 +0200: what about mp3=lame or mp3=ffmpeg? This will also be easily extendable when the next implementations comes along (mp3=newmp3lib). I gotta admit... I didn't quite understand

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-12 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 07:26 +0100, Steve Long wrote: Duncan wrote: Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600: The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than one mp3 encoder. In almost every

[gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread Duncan
Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600: The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than one mp3 encoder. In almost every case of the use flag being applied above, there is already support for another