[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

Michael Palimaka posted on Mon, 23 Nov 2015 02:54:58 +1100 as excerpted: > On 22/11/15 05:51, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:01:21 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Alexander Berntsen >>> wrote: When I do QA in

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

Michał Górny wrote: > > commit EAPI 6 ebuilds to ~arch. For an overlay maintainer like me, it is not reasonable to bump eclasses locally. So please bump the relevant eclasses timely, most notably (AFAICS these needs just extending the check; perhaps a *negative* check would

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

On 22/11/15 05:51, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:01:21 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Alexander Berntsen >> wrote: >>> When I do QA in projects I'm involved with (at least outside of >>> Gentoo), we don't do it live

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

Am Sonntag, 22. November 2015, 16:54:58 schrieb Michael Palimaka: > > Is the state of stable really that bad? I see this sentiment a lot. > > I run mostly-stable systems and rarely have an issue with old/missing > packages (but I'm involved in the maintenance of many of the packages I > use so I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 22/11/15 05:51, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Is the state of stable really that bad? I see this sentiment a lot. > > I run mostly-stable systems and rarely have an issue with old/missing > packages (but I'm involved

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:05:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an > >> advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :) > Only that there is no real

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, »Q« wrote: > When ~ keywording is needed for dependencies, the PM's output makes > it clear what's needed. In cases where EAPI 6 is needed for > dependencies but the PM is unaware of EAPI 6, will there be good > clues in the PM's output that the PM itself needs to be ~

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:06:23 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, »Q« wrote: > > > When ~ keywording is needed for dependencies, the PM's output makes > > it clear what's needed. In cases where EAPI 6 is needed for > > dependencies but the PM is unaware

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

Michael Orlitzky posted on Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:45:49 -0500 as excerpted: > On 11/17/2015 05:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> I have the pleasure to announce that portage-2.2.25 has just been >> committed and it comes with complete EAPI 6 support. This effectively >> means that from this moment

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 6 portage is out!

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Gentoo has never really guaranteed the stability of a mostly-stable > system with a few ~arch accept-keyworded packages as that's simply not a > properly testable setup. > True, but Gentoo has never really guaranteed much