Hi list.
I've been working on getting a Gentoo version of Debians resolvconf package
into portage. It's basically a re-write of the internals (which I don't like)
but the command line, setup and plugin system are 100% compatible (except for
the plugins which may need one line changing). As
On Monday 20 March 2006 18:42, Roy Marples wrote:
Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the same?
If so, what version number should I be using? It's currently just called
resolvconf-0.1
I would say gentoo-resolvconf as it's a rewrite/fork.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò
On Monday 20 March 2006 17:59, Luca Barbato wrote:
why not having it implemented as eselect module? ^^;
I am not familiar with eselect.
Also, I fail to see the benefit of using the eselect framework
when /sbin/functions.sh provides what I need as a base.
Of course, feel free to talk me around.
Roy Marples wrote:
Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the same? If
so, what version number should I be using? It's currently just called
resolvconf-0.1
Definately change the name of the package (if not the script itself)
otherwise the Debian resolvconf author
Daniel Drake wrote:
Roy Marples wrote:
Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the
same? If so, what version number should I be using? It's currently
just called resolvconf-0.1
Definately change the name of the package (if not the script itself)
otherwise the Debian
