Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-26 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:55:10AM +, Sam James wrote: > > > > On 25 Nov 2021, at 17:07, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > > > On 2021-11-25 18:01, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > >>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 > >> Would you see something

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 17:07, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > On 2021-11-25 18:01, Piotr Karbowski wrote: >>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 >> Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, >> elasticsearch, or have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 03:21, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann > --- > [snip] > +On 2021-11-21, a member of the QA project accidentially de-keyworded > +MariaDB 10.6 to address a file collision, users, who also had latest >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:59, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > If you do a normal world upgrade, this is the default portage behavior, not? > I.e. package manager will downgrade if you don't stop. And especially on > servers, people tend to use cronjobs/scripts to do that... I would really not

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:37, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > For the records: > I hope that this news item won't get delayed by the recent ComRel bug someone > filled against me regarding this news item. No need to reference that here. Please keep that to e.g. -core. > While we often rush with

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 2021-11-25 at 18:01 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 > > Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, > elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? I don't think

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:01 PM Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 > > Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, > elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? > > It's all

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2021-11-25 18:01, Piotr Karbowski wrote: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? It's all cool and giggles until

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Piotr Karbowski
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? It's all cool and giggles until you realize that even such random variable is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread David Seifert
On Thu, 2021-11-25 at 17:21 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > Hi, > > On 25/11/2021 16.50, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > As a side note, maybe ebuild should add sanity checks (like those from > > glibc) to > > prevent downgrades, otherwise people could still accidentally hit the > > issue > > You might

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Piotr Karbowski
Hi, On 25/11/2021 16.50, Pacho Ramos wrote: As a side note, maybe ebuild should add sanity checks (like those from glibc) to prevent downgrades, otherwise people could still accidentally hit the issue You might have valid use cases to downgrade mysql, if you are okay not preserving data. I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 25-11-2021 a las 09:20 -0500, Mike Gilbert escribió [...] > I don't like the phrase "forcefully downgraded" here. This implies > > > that something happened without the user's consent. emerge would have > > > informed them of the downgrade before it happened. I would suggest > > > removing

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:59 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2021-11-25 04:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On 2021-11-21, keywords for dev-db/mariadb-10.6 were removed to > > address a file collision with dev-db/mariadb-connector-c. This > > unintentionally triggered a version downgrade

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, On 2021-11-25 04:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: On 2021-11-21, keywords for dev-db/mariadb-10.6 were removed to address a file collision with dev-db/mariadb-connector-c. This unintentionally triggered a version downgrade for users who had successfully upgraded to dev-db/mariadb-10.6 already.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On 25.11.2021 04:21, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann > --- > ...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 46 +++ > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >> +On 2021-11-21, a member of the QA project accidentially de-keyworded >> +MariaDB 10.6 to address a file collision, users, who also had latest >> +dev-db/mariadb-connector-c installed,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2021-11-25 04:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: Also, I don't think it is relevant to call out the mistake by the QA team in a news item intended for end users. My sentiment exactly. No finger pointing in news items, please. I don't like the phrase "forcefully downgraded" here. This implies that

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-24 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > +On 2021-11-21, a member of the QA project accidentially de-keyworded > +MariaDB 10.6 to address a file collision, users, who also had latest > +dev-db/mariadb-connector-c installed, experienced (NOTE: The default > +MySQL connector in