Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-28 Thread William Hubbs
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 03:18:28PM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > > > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of > > subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. > > > > But I respect your decision guys.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-27 Thread Matthias Maier
Guys - we have resolved this off list. No need for more discussion. Best, Matthias

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-27 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > > > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of > > subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. > > > > But I respect your decision guys. I am

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-27 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 27-10-2018 15:18:28 +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast. Hrm ... given Github's not integrated with Gentoo, one can argue that sending a patch to the ML is actually more simple/fast for developers. I don't think sending

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-27 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote: That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches until there's an agreement on how to do that.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-27 Thread Michal Prívozník
On 10/26/2018 05:42 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: >> >> So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather >> unfortunate. > > In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if > there were, it would have a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-26 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather > unfortunate. In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if there were, it would have a @gentoo.org alias that you could send patches to. Bugzilla is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-26 Thread Michal Prívozník
On 10/26/2018 06:52 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > > On 26.10.2018 04:04, Matthias Maier wrote: >>> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing >>> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches >> Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-25 Thread Mikle Kolyada
On 26.10.2018 04:04, Matthias Maier wrote: >> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing >> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches > Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then? Because we have github/project alias for that purpose

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-25 Thread Matthias Maier
> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing > list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4

2018-10-25 Thread Mikle Kolyada
On 25.10.2018 18:31, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik > --- > app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest | 1 + > .../libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild| 40 +++ > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > create mode 100644