Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 03:18:28PM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > > > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of > > subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. > > > > But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches > > until there's an agreement on how to do that. > > > > Michal > > > > Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast. Actually, github is not our primary way of handling patches. It can't be because our social contract requires us to use all open source tools. It is an option that people use, yes, but we can't force people to use it. William signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
Guys - we have resolved this off list. No need for more discussion. Best, Matthias
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > > > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of > > subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. > > > > But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches > > until there's an agreement on how to do that. > > > > Michal > > > > Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast. > I don't appreciate this type of argumentation. _everyone_ else doesn't use Github. Some people use it. Why doesn't Gentoo just use binary packages like _everyone_else; the answer is because Gentoo values building from source and we also value controlling our own destiny by running our own tooling. > > Also, as I see, tamiko has been applying all of your (recent) patches, > so maybe you can ask him to become your personal committer (/ proxied > maintainer), and send patches via PM so everyone stays happy? :) > I'm happy to see patches on the list; I'd rather have too much email on the list then not enough. -A
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 27-10-2018 15:18:28 +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast. Hrm ... given Github's not integrated with Gentoo, one can argue that sending a patch to the ML is actually more simple/fast for developers. I don't think sending patches to this ML targets the right audience, yet I welcome the contribution. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 10/27/18 2:16 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote: That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches until there's an agreement on how to do that. Michal Why can't you use Github like _everyone_ else? It's really simple and fast. Also, as I see, tamiko has been applying all of your (recent) patches, so maybe you can ask him to become your personal committer (/ proxied maintainer), and send patches via PM so everyone stays happy? :)
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 10/26/2018 05:42 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: >> >> So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather >> unfortunate. > > In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if > there were, it would have a @gentoo.org alias that you > could send patches to. Well, why don't we create something like virtualizat...@gentoo.org? That would be a mailing list to discuss virtualization related topics. Bugzilla is still the official (and in this case, > best) place to put these in my opinion. I don't think so. I've been attaching patches to BZ in the past and the response time was very poor. I know everybody is working on gentoo in their spare time and I appreciate it, but why not use something that works for both sides? I think that if we want to attract more volunteers we have to have a process that goes the least into their way. > > Personally I don't mind them on the -dev list, but they do get sent to a > thousand people who have no interest in or ability to commit them. > That is the case on every mailing list. Every -dev list has number of subscribes far bigger than number of people with commit access. But I respect your decision guys. I am going to stop posting patches until there's an agreement on how to do that. Michal
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 10/26/2018 04:40 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather > unfortunate. In this case there's no "project" associated with libvirt-snmp; but if there were, it would have a @gentoo.org alias that you could send patches to. Bugzilla is still the official (and in this case, best) place to put these in my opinion. Personally I don't mind them on the -dev list, but they do get sent to a thousand people who have no interest in or ability to commit them.
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 10/26/2018 06:52 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > > On 26.10.2018 04:04, Matthias Maier wrote: >>> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing >>> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches >> Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then? > Because we have github/project alias for that purpose > So the desired way is to use github pull requests? That is rather unfortunate. Michal
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 26.10.2018 04:04, Matthias Maier wrote: >> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing >> list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches > Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then? Because we have github/project alias for that purpose signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
> could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing > list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches Why? What's the purpose of a developer mailing list then?
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-emulation/libvirt-snmp: version bump to 0.0.4
On 25.10.2018 18:31, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
> ---
> app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest | 1 +
> .../libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild| 40 +++
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
>
> diff --git a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> index ea3d956712a..b7eb38bce37 100644
> --- a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> +++ b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/Manifest
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.2.tar.gz 152790 BLAKE2B
> b2e5eee2d67283112556c52921b14029a90d5cedf0c4575e056475191470a4b6bf5d837f1ca942b848f6509da4aa12daa508bbfc5272e1435e73fbfc290e1967
> SHA512
> 13a522c765d278d3b8f8ab9f32f97c8531f6d131afcb0ce62ae397631db92ed3b585ad221a1f2b3bc17907cc4d61adca4a2071b0458a05f2bff5ca06191e1478
> DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.3.tar.gz 161186 BLAKE2B
> 1b43e7e81a43d4e969e2e30d7d62776743b3c5fb19929fb1606850946c665ad1ca662bee88743f60f202cd92fc42be1cc2cc94e99bf1d137df61bec09850de93
> SHA512
> 6ffda3594ddc513e05e31e7d347a12e371dca3cc698ca790a70e2d01b2ceac6acb5dd6e3cd19723817b41aa62e0c0a49c01c47cb9ce379ac491856a7e88e5a08
> +DIST libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.tar.gz 157859 BLAKE2B
> e2c8fcdd97ba9b55bd4d318c63f7738024c1360ee10aa4e685c2ea6ca02478206febff30f3e1a82eb1a2dadaa52a377cfbce538e12e33f4ea2fe10b1a089945d
> SHA512
> dbf47e7983f9bd6fcff205fffd1f6006268cca774cf427d39dec84dc7de37b545c0dfcbb2c6f171f55d73487cdec13341097137e24de2dea58ce90494d281162
> diff --git a/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
> b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..f0eb657001f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app-emulation/libvirt-snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.4.ebuild
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +# Copyright 1999-2018 Gentoo Foundation
> +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> +
> +EAPI=7
> +
> +inherit eutils
> +
> +DESCRIPTION="Provides SNMP functionality for libvirt"
> +HOMEPAGE="http://libvirt.org;
> +SRC_URI="http://www.libvirt.org/sources/snmp/${P}.tar.gz;
> +
> +LICENSE="GPL-2"
> +SLOT="0"
> +KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
> +IUSE=""
> +
> +DEPEND=""
> +RDEPEND="${DEPEND}
> + app-emulation/libvirt
> + net-analyzer/net-snmp"
> +BDEPEND="
> + virtual/pkgconfig"
> +
> +src_install() {
> + default
> + newinitd "${FILESDIR}/libvirt-snmp.initd-r1" "${PN}"
> + newconfd "${FILESDIR}/libvirt-snmp.confd" "${PN}"
> +}
> +
> +pkg_postinst() {
> + elog "This daemon runs as an AgentX sub-daemon for snmpd. You should
> therefore"
> + elog "enable the AgentX functionality in snmpd by specifying the
> following"
> + elog "in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf:"
> + elog " master agentx"
> + elog "It is further recommended to send traps to the localhost as well
> using"
> + elog "this option:"
> + elog " trap2sink localhost"
> + elog "More information is available here:"
> + elog " http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Libvirt-snmp;
> +}
could you please stop sending project related stuff to the -dev mailing
list? It is irrelevant place to provide bump patches
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
