On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:52:35 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> If not, I would rather see you pick one of the two options above.
-r1 bump all existing consumers of that eclass first? :)
pgpOohqnJQZK6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:49:32AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:26:09 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > I don't know portage internals, so I have no idea what the deal with
> > this is or how to fix it.
> >
> > Did you report it to the portage team?
>
> Report what?
>
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:26:09 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> I don't know portage internals, so I have no idea what the deal with
> this is or how to fix it.
>
> Did you report it to the portage team?
Report what?
1. Didn't have access to the box
2. No way to even conceive of producing enough
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:26:09AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> There's no way to know whether removing virtual/rust will cause these
> kinds of issues, so I'm still not convinced that we shouldn't remove it.
Sorry, I meant virtual/cargo here.
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:19:14PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:27:49 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > No, I'm just saying this:
> >
> > We don't know that there is a portage bug from what I'm reading in this
> > thread. We are talking about possible bugs, but a
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:27:49 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> No, I'm just saying this:
>
> We don't know that there is a portage bug from what I'm reading in this
> thread. We are talking about possible bugs, but a possible bug isn't a bug.
> If there is an issue cite it otherwise move on.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:48:14PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 10:34 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:18:17AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > > On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 12:05:02 -0500
> > > William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > > > If a build dep of something
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 10:34 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:18:17AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 12:05:02 -0500
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > > If a build dep of something changes, the correct response with
> > > --with-bdeps=y is to rebuild
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:34:40 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> Let's go ahead and do the change and file bugs against portage if there
> are issues.
Any time I find something that I'd imagine portage could fix, I file a bug.
But I already have so many open bugs for things portage does wrong that
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:18:17AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 12:05:02 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > If a build dep of something changes, the correct response with
> > --with-bdeps=y is to rebuild everything that depends on the changed dep.
>
> Unfortunately, my
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 12:05:02 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> If a build dep of something changes, the correct response with
> --with-bdeps=y is to rebuild everything that depends on the changed dep.
Unfortunately, my learned experience of portage is the "correct
response" is not something portage
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 08:36:47PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:55:11 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > Sure, but rebuild changes are exactly what you would want. that's how
> > software written in go gets rebuilt for example, which is exactly what
> > you want when go
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 01:42:48 +
Michael Everitt wrote:
> > I agree that some rebuilds might be unnecessary, but if you don't like
> > compiling/building software Gentoo isn't for you.
> >
> > William
> >
> There's a subtle difference between compiling for compiling's sake, and
> compiling
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:55:11 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> Sure, but rebuild changes are exactly what you would want. that's how
> software written in go gets rebuilt for example, which is exactly what
> you want when go is upgraded.
>
> I agree that some rebuilds might be unnecessary, but if
On 27/10/19 00:55, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +0100, Michael Everitt wrote:
>> On 26/10/19 23:35, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:17:18AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 11:14 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +0100, Michael Everitt wrote:
> On 26/10/19 23:35, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:17:18AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 11:14 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 05:59 Kent Fredric wrote:
> >>>
>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:17:18AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 11:14 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 05:59 Kent Fredric wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:03:39 -0700
> > > Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > >
> > > > not used anymore
> > > >
> > >
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 11:14 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 05:59 Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:03:39 -0700
> > Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> >
> > > not used anymore
> > >
> > > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/695698
> > > Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev
>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 05:59 Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:03:39 -0700
> Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
>
> > not used anymore
> >
> > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/695698
> > Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev
>
>
> Its likely this removal will cause the same kinds of problems faced by
>
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:34:50 +0200
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> So basically the eclass should be bumped, with the old one deprecated?
I don't think rev-bumping the eclass is a useful way to fix this either.
It could work, but I suspect it just expands the problem slightly.
pgp4WzprN2xLh.pgp
Il giorno sab 26 ott 2019 alle ore 06:24 Michael Everitt
ha scritto:
> On 26/10/19 04:59, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:03:39 -0700
> > Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> >
> >> not used anymore
> >>
> >> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/695698
> >> Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev
> >
> >
On 26/10/19 04:59, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:03:39 -0700
> Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
>
>> not used anymore
>>
>> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/695698
>> Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev
>
> Its likely this removal will cause the same kinds of problems faced by
> the recent
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:03:39 -0700
Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> not used anymore
>
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/695698
> Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev
Its likely this removal will cause the same kinds of problems faced by
the recent virtual/pam removal, just its more insidious, as the
23 matches
Mail list logo
