On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:10:39 -0500
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bet there are other users around, who think a config file format
change that doesnt break anything but produce warnings in the first
place is non-critical.
I'm another
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Are you a Paludis user who thinks that
Irrelevant, people can think beyond just paludis.
and who knows what news item delivery looks like?
Irrelevant, what it looks like has nothing to do with whether or not it
is critical.
On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:48:31 +0200
Maurice van der Pot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Are you a Paludis user who thinks that
Irrelevant, people can think beyond just paludis.
We're discussing a news item that will only be shown to
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:48:31 +0200
Maurice van der Pot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
and who knows what news item delivery looks like?
Irrelevant, what it looks like has nothing to do with whether or not
On Sun, 06 May 2007 00:09:37 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:48:31 +0200
Maurice van der Pot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
and who knows what news item delivery looks
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
No, but it affects the impact upon user experience, which is the entire
point of the process. This is, after all, about delivering what's best
for affected users.
No it is not.
It is about wether or not this news item would fit into the current set of
rules, which it
I picked a random mail to reply to:
The paludis news item has been approved by me, cause I rock, and
commited to the proper location. Assuming the code Zac wrote was
actually tested and is turned on, the news item will hit the tree soon.
Good Day Sirs.
-Alec
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sun, 6 May 2007 00:30:28 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
No, but it affects the impact upon user experience, which is the
entire point of the process. This is, after all, about delivering
what's best for affected users.
No it is not.
It is about wether or not this
On Sat, 5 May 2007 17:27:45 -0500
»Q« [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you aren't, you won't see the news item.
I saw it when it was posted here.
Because the GLEP 42 process, quite rightly, requires that news items be
posted to -dev for review before they're committed.
It seems important but
The paludis news item has been approved by me, cause I rock, and
commited to the proper location.
Council?
--
Christian Hartmann
http://www.gentoo.org/~ian/
PGP Key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x2154E5EE692A4865
Key fingerprint = 4544 EC0C BAE4 216F 5981 7F95 2154 E5EE
Christian Hartmann napsal(a):
The paludis news item has been approved by me, cause I rock, and
commited to the proper location.
Council?
+1
This should be put on hold until there's some consent and guidelines on
how this is supposed to be used. The current 100+ emails threads clearly
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 01:10:48AM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Christian Hartmann napsal(a):
The paludis news item has been approved by me, cause I rock, and
commited to the proper location.
Council?
+1
This should be put on hold until there's some consent and guidelines on
how this
12 matches
Mail list logo
