On 01/16/10 19:52, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> That is for the overlays, yeah?
> But hov about the cache_*.xml files?
>
> I think what he meant was that should layman really only has one
> directory? One for cache (downloaded/downloadable lists of overlays?
> in /var/cache/layman/?), one for the ma
Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
>> I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
>> should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
>> like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the current
>> PORTDIR
Alex Alexander dixit (2010-01-18, 11:07):
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> > I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
> > should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
> > like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
> should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
> like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the current
> PORTDIR), /var/portage/distfiles (i.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 01/16/10 23:46, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
>> One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
>> read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers).
>
> Why is that? Please tell more.
Maybe you should actua
On Saturday 16 January 2010 17:46:08 Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Higgins wrote:
> > Yes, PORTDIR default location under /usr was a totally stupid thing.
> > Please don't repeat it...
>
> One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
> rea
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Michael Higgins wrote:
> Yes, PORTDIR default location under /usr was a totally stupid thing.
> Please don't repeat it...
One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers). most
singl
On 01/16/10 23:46, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> One thing all you /usr naggers forget is, that /var cannot be shared
> read-only via nfs (or bind mounts in case of virtual servers).
Why is that? Please tell more.
Sebastian
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:57:39 +0100
Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Jörg Schaible:
> > dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > >> 2010/1/16 Peter Volkov :
> > >> > layman cache is nfs distributable.
