Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: 10.0 is retarded How would you like the problem to be addressed? we already have a simple

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Alex Alexander wrote: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: we already have a simple logical version system.  2009.0 is the next step. Years do not make a good versioning scheme, if one release gets out late you're automatically

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Michael Hammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian Pipping schrieb: Does sticking to dates have any real benefits? YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a while discussing if it isn't better

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
Michael Hammer wrote: Sebastian Pipping schrieb: Does sticking to dates have any real benefits? YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a while discussing if it isn't better to switch back to an

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Samuli Suominen wrote: You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are in place already? :-p So what do we do? Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Josh Saddler
Sebastian Pipping wrote: Samuli Suominen wrote: You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are in place already? :-p So what do we do? Sebastian http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Josh Saddler wrote: So what do we do? http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml Please give more precise content pointers or summarize what you want to point out. Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 28 August 2009 04:09:01 Samuli Suominen wrote: Michael Hammer wrote: Sebastian Pipping schrieb: Does sticking to dates have any real benefits? YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Mike Frysinger wrote: 10.0 is retarded How would you like the problem to be addressed? Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: 10.0 is retarded How would you like the problem to be addressed? we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread George Prowse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: 10.0 is retarded How would you like the problem to be addressed? we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step.

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: 10.0 is retarded How would you like the problem to be addressed? we already have a simple logical version system.  2009.0 is the next step.

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-27 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Zac Medico wrote: With the introduction of autobuilds, would it be a good idea to rename the profiles so that they don't have the date association? This does seem to confuse a number of new users who will appear asking where the 2009 profiles are. Maybe, but you could also look at this as a

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-01 Thread AllenJB
Ben de Groot wrote: We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also, there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-01 Thread Zac Medico
AllenJB wrote: Ben de Groot wrote: We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also, there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the time is right to start working on a new set