On 9/3/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And no one has implemented any kind of solution.
You need someone to implement a solution? Surely what we need is for
folks to actually make an announcement in the first place?
I asked for what has become GLEP 42 because we do have a problem
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And no one has implemented any kind of solution.
You need someone to implement a solution? Surely what we need is for
folks to actually make an announcement in the first place?
I asked for what has become GLEP 42
It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or howcan it happen that there are already know bugs in thestable distro ?Just like to make the point that if something requires a dependency in ~arch (unstable), then it isn't/shouldn't be in arch (stable).
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 10:36 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And no one has implemented any kind of solution.
You need someone to implement a solution? Surely what we need is for
folks to actually make an announcement in
Jeff Rollin wrote:
It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
can it happen that there are already know bugs in the
stable distro ?
Just like to make the point that if something requires a dependency in
~arch (unstable), then it isn't/shouldn't be in arch (stable).
Because the
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the thought that stable is always stable or that because we
released things are stable is incorrect ;)
You're not supposed to break the stable tree; that surely must include
stabilising a compiler (which is the _default_ for new installs)
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:44:32 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the thought that stable is always stable or that because
we released things are stable is incorrect ;)
You're not supposed to break the stable tree; that
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 12:34 +0200, Edgar Hucek wrote:
Apeal on extended testing :
Developer, please test things more carefull before you
release it.
I hear this (pardon my French) BULLSHIT all the time from our
developers. Look, people, I asked multiple times for assistance with
testing.
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 22:55 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
We didn't need 3000 more developers ... we just needed to give the
Edgar Hucek wrote:
Apeal on extended testing :
Developer, please test things more carefull before you
release it.
I already found things which does not compile out of
the box.
1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
have to unmask linuxwacom.
Shrug. Noone even filed a
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:34:38 +0200
Edgar Hucek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apeal on extended testing :
Developer, please test things more carefull before you
release it.
There are over 10,000 packages in the tree (11247 to be exact); each
of which can be built many ways with USE flags. It is
Jakub Moc schrieb:
Edgar Hucek wrote:
Apeal on extended testing :
Developer, please test things more carefull before you
release it.
I already found things which does not compile out of
the box.
1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
have to unmask linuxwacom.
Shrug. Noone
Am Samstag, 2. September 2006 13:18 schrieb Edgar Hucek:
2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
merged. It fails on compile the speech-tools.
It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
can it happen that there are already know bugs in the
stable distro ?
Edgar Hucek wrote:
From my point of view, should it be garanted that a package and depencies
compiles when all use flags are enabled. If a depency can't be compiled the
use flag and depence should be dissabled/removed from a package.
cu
Edgar (gimli) Hucek
Give us about 3000 more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edgar Hucek wrote:
Apeal on extended testing :
Developer, please test things more carefull before you
release it.
I already found things which does not compile out of
the box.
1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
have to unmask
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
We didn't need 3000 more developers ... we just needed to give the
developers we have more reasonable notice.
This is the second
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers?
We didn't need 3000 more
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
Is it a bad thing to be saying
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to
19 matches
Mail list logo
