On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
12) EAPI 3 supports .xz, .tar.xz
easy so should be in
Easy, so can we also have .xpi unpack support?
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:26 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100
Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org wrote:
8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks
Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right?
No, current behaviour is
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100
[snip]
12) EAPI 3 supports .xz, .tar.xz
[snip]
Could we have EAPI 3 also support extracting .xpi files? Right now
ebuilds use xpi_unpack() from mozextension.eclass which is
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:23 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) )
What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure.
The replacement is to write the deps
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:23 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) )
What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure.
The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Every single
use of ||
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:25:18 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Every single
use of || ( use? ( ... ) ) in the tree is wrong.
That its use in the tree is often wrong is a non-argument. After all,
it's not the package manager's
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
The behaviour of || ( use? ( ... ) ) is a fluke of an early
implementation of Portage that someone picked up on and documented (with
incorrect examples). It's *already* special, weird behaviour, and it's
On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS?
DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1].
Some eclasses already do this (not base, but others), and if that
default doesn't cover it for you, the function can
Am Donnerstag, den 26.03.2009, 19:12 +0100 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS?
DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1].
Some eclasses already do this (not base, but
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* what the plan is for Portage implementation of that feature, and the
likelihood of it making it
We should have someone dedicated to seeing each item implemented. For
example someone from the council.
Follows a quick list with hopefully no brain farts. In general
On 21:18 Sun 22 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
list to see.
Here's a very simple agenda. I'm at a conference this week, so I'm glad
there weren't a
On 20:38 Sun 22 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
1) EAPI 3 has pkg_pretend.
3) EAPI 3 has use dependency defaults
5) EAPI 3 has a default src_install
15) USE is stricter in EAPI 3
19) RDEPEND=DEPEND gone in EAPI 3
22) EAPI 3 has nonfatal, utilities die
Very Yes. I would really like to see
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) )
What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure.
The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Every single use of
|| ( use? ( ... ) ) in the tree is
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100
Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org wrote:
8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks
Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right?
No, current behaviour is undefined for not a file.
14) EAPI 3 supports pkg_info on installed
Am Sonntag, den 22.03.2009, 20:38 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
list
On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS?
DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1].
Some eclasses already do this (not base, but others), and if that
default doesn't cover it for you, the function can be overridden.
Concerning the argument of declarative
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
list to see.
Continuing the whole EAPI 3 thing...
17 matches
Mail list logo
