Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
Am Samstag, 16. Februar 2013, 14:08:06 schrieb Pacho Ramos: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-emulation/e-uae app-emulation/uae AFAIK both are long dead. The current actively developed uae variant is PUAE, but I'd say it is not ready for a wider audience right now. It syncs regularly with WinUAE, but its GUIs are in a bad shape. The configuration documentation is ... well ... lacking at best. The PUAE maintainer, GnoStiC, has only a Mac to develop on. All linux stuff is currently done by me. And I am busy cleaning up code and getting to a state where I can bring the front-ends back into a working state. PUAE: https://github.com/GnoStiC/PUAE My cleanup-branch: https://github.com/Yamakuzure/PUAE Note: We cross-merge. regularly. Most people use an Amiga emulator for some nostalgic gaming only anyway. Therefore it might be a good idea to add fs-uae (gamerlay-stable) to the tree, if there is any need for it. However, if there is a need to keep uae and e-uae, I could proxy maintain both. The code base I am working on is the same after all. And I have plenty of Amiga stuff lying around to test p-uae (Dragons Megademo anyone? ;)) anyway. Cheers Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 02/16/2013 08:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: net-firewall/xtables-addons (proxy maintained) net-misc/ipv6calc I can take care of these two. I use both. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:06:19 -0500 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 10:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until sys-kernel/linux-firmware has proper license labels, and allows for selective installation? I would be very happy to have the licensing issues fixed, it looks like it won't be fun, however I was originally told that redist was a required right for things to be added to linux-firmware at all so I fear a lot of things may be out of sync in the upstream package. Please though, can we all stop pretending savedconfig doesn't exist? We allow for selective installation already, AND you can install none of it if you want, no one is forcing files on anyone that doesn't want them. savedconfig is a cheap hack. It lacks all the features USE flags have. Really. We're talking here about replacing well-organized packages with one cheap hack for the laziness of a few developers. But that's how Gentoo worked for a long time. - -- Best regards, Michał Górny -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlEgq4IACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1t3AQAkIzPTeQNhqUTbKWc5PakR5sJ HYGBwYUi4j6Ljl7pQN/dDJaNmBy5rfRF3vyoIeglSt9IoHsNsDp+2bEY+easUx/W fAJPMgdGWg8u3/Sr/SgMzqFrJayiMZjqHKy6tPQFnCh9Kxx0HuP8/XBT1eyJkByY DfmO8DI/ps1rUKYpJcg= =X/fN -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 17/02/13 12:05, Michał Górny wrote: savedconfig is a cheap hack. It lacks all the features USE flags have. Really. We're talking here about replacing well-organized packages with one cheap hack for the laziness of a few developers. But that's how Gentoo worked for a long time. This is how you would justify adding separate ebuild for every firmware from the linux-firmware bundle? Please
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:09:22 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 17/02/13 12:05, Michał Górny wrote: savedconfig is a cheap hack. It lacks all the features USE flags have. Really. We're talking here about replacing well-organized packages with one cheap hack for the laziness of a few developers. But that's how Gentoo worked for a long time. This is how you would justify adding separate ebuild for every firmware from the linux-firmware bundle? I would justify it through keeping things split and bit-exact clean, instead of tightly integrated. Separate ebuilds mean that: - each firmware has proper license, - each firmware can be installed separately and it is _clean_ which firmwares are actually installed (think of binpkgs), - each firmware can be upgraded when it needs to be (alternatively: all firmwares are re-installed over and over again when new firmware is added). And I wouldn't mind having even 200 sys-firmware/ packages. And don't tell me that firmwares change every month, these are particularly maintenance-free packages. And I don't mind having meta-packages for lazy people. Although I believe that having a few 'group' packages for firmwares will be 'acceptable'. Assuming those firmwares share a common license. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb: On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or not? These are included in linux-firmware. And because Intel has EOL'ed the chipsets, it is unlikely that the firmware will ever be updated again. So technically there is no necessity to keep them. On the non-technical side, there are users who prefer them over the linux-firmware package and will be upset if we remove them. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
Peter Stuge schrieb: linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which was my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing the package. Just create a text file /etc/portage/savedconfig/sys-kernel/linux-firmware with the desired filename(s) and emerge linux-firmware with USE=savedconfig enabled. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:08:06 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: dev-util/oprofile Took this one, bumped the version and did some small fixes. With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Saturday 16 February 2013 14:08:06 Pacho Ramos wrote: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-dicts/stardict-freedict-eng-rus app-doc/gimp-help app-emulation/e-uae app-emulation/uae app-text/cuneiform (proxy maintained) app-text/mathtex app-text/yagf dev-db/gigabase dev-libs/guiloader-c++ dev-libs/guiloader dev-libs/judy dev-libs/xmlrpc-c (proxy maintained) dev-perl/SpeedyCGI dev-util/crow-designer dev-util/oprofile dev-vcs/monotone (proxy maintained) gnome-extra/gpointing-device-settings media-gfx/aewan media-gfx/transfig media-gfx/xfig net-analyzer/smokeping net-firewall/ufw-frontends (proxy maintained) net-firewall/xtables-addons (proxy maintained) net-libs/libmnl net-libs/udns net-misc/ipv6calc net-misc/l7-protocols net-misc/netkit-telnetd net-misc/udpxy net-nds/shelldap (proxy maintained) net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp (proxy maintained) sys-devel/qconf sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode sys-kernel/linuxwacom-module (proxy maintained) www-misc/fcgiwrap (proxy maintained) x11-libs/gtkdatabox May I proxy net-misc/ipv6calc ? Thank you, Aaron signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or not? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode I want this installed on my system. sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode But not this. could we just remove them Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. On the plus side it seems that these particular packages would require very limited effort to maintain. :) //Peter pgp2FtFzmoEAI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 16/02/13 15:59, Peter Stuge wrote: Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode I want this installed on my system. sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode But not this. could we just remove them Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Having separate ebuild for every possible firmware is not the way to go anyway.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 16/02/2013 14:59, Peter Stuge wrote: Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your personal lazyness. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
El mié, 06-02-2013 a las 18:17 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) escribió: Hi ALL: I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka) dev-libs/libev which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526 net-misc/ofono need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.12) If any developer willing to help, would be great! ~ and feel free to touch the ebuilds which I maintain Dennis Looks like metadata needs updating ;) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 08:44 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or not? ozzie firmware # qfile iwlwifi-3945-2.ucode iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode sys-kernel/linux-firmware (/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-4965-2.ucode) sys-kernel/linux-firmware (/lib/firmware/iwlwifi-3945-2.ucode) Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do that now. - -ZC -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRH5qfAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKjiQP/0Ha0GTKy82j7Ce3Wk5Vw/F8 rWOg6SNmpra4VktXnCVLD4Ctm5Zhv+DT1I0LBzEmm6LcUmz/S/QpBI5+H+WiiOrB ig0Vhbq6GNAO/8iAWOIXYD/hl4xlGX5YfAAix4T7IG50pkbqJp/XcktWrhw+Jgin FrsHI88JNB5dN+yYs6xle0DiXon9ZFlEOeF1OjCQTe1ynK2+Eam9VQ65x1kZXxvr zWH02tJvcI+MtCGbvT/IpjXRkh4gDM4jYfvCodpRrQu3lpunV5RNvE91NcxGQuck jWvDdJvrzYzJqb+tEAImoParRk3fZij5imI9IXaRe9w0Qy0XIeB8icqZa8uahRJy Peiup4r74SzrbhbCAsj+HwtoZlazblTgLZoc57RsJScJHovVVE5yGpmZbA694zLj D6phDeqid6C2LLbK0lyB5HTj7/vZhB35QYPVLC6evFNhION/Ixb3AGi8r732fxOu 9Qaogk9mZizZejW9lh8r1eNhB1ZCrTQlrer8GbOBsRe9EDsqQov1rX5t6/Z5vZ1x Nh6ePhqAk4wxsLdakwJy9q+lHt2Z/rzYlQhccnP4yVNLjrFcEWfP6xKsY7qnnwK9 nvzed0C/4nkgVtclKY438Tje3Ptujnt9xCXYLKxeWt841P2vnrRHl9Cmh74HgDQ0 a50wMFPwOpSkeOBHrC3h =gyW9 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do that now. Go for it. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your personal lazyness. Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do that now. Go for it. Please don't. Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until sys-kernel/linux-firmware has proper license labels, and allows for selective installation? Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 10:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten wrote: Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your personal lazyness. Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not install those firmware packages. Or am I missing your point? - -ZC -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRH6JJAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKGUUP/j7VoLpd90VWaiDJLZIrjFeF 544wYvutiau5sqLE2Q7cv8QyuNz/QEjmBANMKNpwl6YQpAichsXOUeeDfzL3KV1U WG+ntr3xTC/QK1ZoNCRyTg2i5LPEVZvm4kVxVlEpTnNJuYbxYfw+iygq03vL1NqD iYEdl9Ykp8uOxSP5vykWG8nXYzeXmC/y6h4qTmyeBbtsAsg4ZC5U7bQ/b5au5W+5 quzk+tkWSZabYb/6K/gmTYswcT8Zjs23GLw+8lcqhIm0iTyUl2Ppm4S/1BPBtzPR posXUTEdJO7+vELQhShSK5JEPZLZZ3d8YF3WM5dP7lnLmf+Qat0nQRTvg53PP/E0 dl4Va6QYa3VXLOTrhSwIB13sVq9JOyH6ZXZ3urQdYJobjGK4b53KF6KhCCwshcBK TGlKoq+KuQQPy6hTrytsF2/0nGtSsezZ6gneu7LHFm+IzN/tz9Qz0QcEdgEneynG exReg3M7UKcY/zY/nLBUBWuu27mXCfnM7aJ0NEIXNOsq12Qt3ZCtLyfLeI0eTvWb LzNELHGmjDTipdPsDLvqqt39nJZ8Gn+dR0W35waP3hVMHXMK3RPNtUHLvpxqhqxy PIzDki4Anfb793Tm5eCTfHMWiB3eUA5+q0sEZnrGgjxA4AXR1+5Em6ixFD4XdW9u 0oacFahvXMOIT3DlWtC7 =ejGq -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 16/02/2013 16:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. Which Peter's remark is not about. I do feel we need to fix the license issue, but I don't think this is compounding anything to clear up the tree first. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Use savedconfig linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which was my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing the package. Of course it does save packaging effort, even if just one-time. I'll get back to you if I have some idea for improving UX. negative words I don't know why you think that it's OK to behave any way you like. //Peter pgpjo7oiYIYoh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \Zero Chaos\ Farina wrote: Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not install those firmware packages. Yes, but ACCEPT_LICENSE wouldn't work. It would still be necessary to include all licenses, even for firmware packages that are not installed. Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \Zero Chaos\ Farina wrote: Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not install those firmware packages. Yes, but ACCEPT_LICENSE wouldn't work. It would still be necessary to include all licenses, even for firmware packages that are not installed. I'm sure I'm not the only one who really doesn't care about having ACCEPT_LICENSE work properly for a package full of binary blobs. It seems like a rather insignificant reason to split the package up. If some of the licenses involved are particularly offensive to a large number of people, then it might be worth while to split those particular files out.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Mike Gilbert wrote: I'm sure I'm not the only one who really doesn't care about having ACCEPT_LICENSE work properly for a package full of binary blobs. It seems like a rather insignificant reason to split the package up. Nobody has suggested to split it up. But until this is sorted out, we should maybe keep the existing individual packages, unless there's a good reason to remove them. If some of the licenses involved are particularly offensive to a large number of people, then it might be worth while to split those particular files out. Look into the WHENCE file and be horrified. Taking just the first ten items (of a total 114): Unknown license (3 times) GPL, but without source (3 times) All rights reserved BSD, without source Right for redistribution not granted Permission is hereby granted for the distribution [...] as part of a Linux or other Open Source operating system kernel With one exception, we are not even allowed to redistribute these. Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Look into the WHENCE file and be horrified. Taking just the first ten items (of a total 114): Unknown license (3 times) GPL, but without source (3 times) All rights reserved BSD, without source Right for redistribution not granted Permission is hereby granted for the distribution [...] as part of a Linux or other Open Source operating system kernel With one exception, we are not even allowed to redistribute these. Heh, point taken.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 2013-02-16 Sat 05:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: net-libs/libmnl Added to netmon herd. Tim pgpHn4U3M2RcW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 10:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten wrote: On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do that now. Go for it. Please don't. Sorry, it was done before this email and I just saw it now. Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until sys-kernel/linux-firmware has proper license labels, and allows for selective installation? I would be very happy to have the licensing issues fixed, it looks like it won't be fun, however I was originally told that redist was a required right for things to be added to linux-firmware at all so I fear a lot of things may be out of sync in the upstream package. Please though, can we all stop pretending savedconfig doesn't exist? We allow for selective installation already, AND you can install none of it if you want, no one is forcing files on anyone that doesn't want them. - -Zero -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRIGVLAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKqDkP/AskECyNydR91/JeKm9gwrSW bNbDmkkj5LbN3rqBDj5oMhHauKrTHnYr5K6Cd7oh/trcuM7Njo0AsAGbTpq2KdYv QZyFKg5gKHXDDA2ASWhDnlNyvOwBgUKONdMdnQS8GTu7e9XtfbVUq7sHSHaXxXng 9055/kHHwpAxV24I7lIfGe/P4AT02cTW21NsHm0YYTi1IA2uMSQ2c3laqpfRDJie vq0/6JK8rvDOnS1cIFi9TQSYmN1jR6Qf/QGinxLkZfeiVUEf/msWaQGFtT9XXsDC Y1aIBJxqc1AoeK844dGRkww1oTo3wzhXNCX7Z9uZP5wHUKLD4o/E8alB79p/wvQt +dUmCj6Q49cku9r0fb8gFiwNjy1AdxuAg20DOA/isNTOO78tdN+rQ5ow/uThZX23 lsS4ZOFRA216+Is0LtPVbcM7PrlR0x3PUE9+qvNV2D/VlfAJPEtZOSBCqkpILfue wycbKNOi4tLBh3RmtEV23y9SUPNmjYsazD2sOy+MpkPhbTZOZAT46M7HM3F+mwfh 6K5+/5HXSKXhS75E1KRvTgXfVwaehLVGzUBfHdosfKFLffFY6DXzA6roo+RCKJ7J EvrrLwpNzd3tCHHAefm5Wi32n4k1GG5izY9PLnDeDs+JVgc03gX/zuuZmbi1s8lb bVHJ1IJjendYHqyLLqpN =CCk5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 13:46 Sun 03 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: dev-cpp/gtest I'll take this one. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:16:32 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/03/2013 09:45 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: dev-libs/boehm-gc Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. Since it's a dependency of one package I maintain (dev-lang/opendylan) I have a marginal interest in keeping it around. Feel free to add me to metadata too if I forget. Added both of us. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
Hi ALL: I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka) dev-libs/libev which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429526 net-misc/ofono need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.12) If any developer willing to help, would be great! ~ and feel free to touch the ebuilds which I maintain Dennis On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote: On 13:46 Sun 03 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: dev-cpp/gtest I'll take this one. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 5 February 2013 23:58, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] media-sound/dbmeasure [...] I'll keep this one. Cheers, -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) (arunsr | GNOME)
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
El mar, 05-02-2013 a las 19:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: [...] media-sound/dbmeasure [...] Ford Prefect will still take care of this one signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 02:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due leio lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-benchmarks/gtkperf mine. just fixed https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 - -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlERl/gACgkQknrdDGLu8JBGQwEAjU+yc8/aNFKMdOYUTbJZcvyj DoCW+OEAD3RnA4bqWUUA/jXEg/lz9FoWR7UjggZIukGjTRK3POqlVs0IZfj4nJ3U =eFSz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/augeas app-admin/puppet dev-ml/ocaml-augeas dev-python/python-augeas dev-ruby/facter dev-ruby/hiera taking these :D Also, if anyone else wants to help me with these it would be appreciated. Puppet and friends are not unmaintained. Ruby and sysadmin herds are taking care of these already. No problem having you as co-maintainer there though, just let us know before you do any major changes (most of us are in #gentoo-infra) Theo
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 02/04/2013 09:54 AM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/augeas app-admin/puppet dev-ml/ocaml-augeas dev-python/python-augeas dev-ruby/facter dev-ruby/hiera taking these :D Also, if anyone else wants to help me with these it would be appreciated. Puppet and friends are not unmaintained. Ruby and sysadmin herds are taking care of these already. No problem having you as co-maintainer there though, just let us know before you do any major changes (most of us are in #gentoo-infra) Theo Ya, I didn't plan on anything major at all. -- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 09:56 PM, Tim Harder wrote: On 2013-02-03 Sun 04:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: net-dns/ldns-utils net-dns/unbound net-libs/ldns I'll help maintain these. Tim @Tim: you can add me there, too. Michael - -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlEPk1oACgkQknrdDGLu8JDGnwD/V3iu0OSElPK83CWl3I38SHZZ j4HbkuGOTlcss9SNDz4A/0KFwP6Se5hi7NOuEeShFKPCVtZyxxkozLDVmC+jpFcS =OQ9n -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
03.02.2013 16:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: dev-libs/confuse I will pick up this one. I use it in one of my projects -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo Linux Developer Desktop-effects project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 13:11 Sat 02 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: app-emulation/vov app-text/rtf2html net-misc/directvnc Those will be maintained by Dennis (dlan) Lan and I will proxy. I updated metadata.xml. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-backup/dar I'll take this one. Looks like most of the open bugs should be trivial to fix. Rich
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/augeas app-admin/puppet dev-ml/ocaml-augeas dev-python/python-augeas dev-ruby/facter dev-ruby/hiera taking these :D -- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/augeas app-admin/puppet dev-ml/ocaml-augeas dev-python/python-augeas dev-ruby/facter dev-ruby/hiera taking these :D Also, if anyone else wants to help me with these it would be appreciated. -- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: dev-libs/boehm-gc Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
Le dimanche 03 février 2013 à 12:44 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : Due tester lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-dicts/verbiste I am taking this. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 03/02/13 13:44, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due tester lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: media-libs/libgpod this should have been under the pda herd all along, i'll add the missing herd to metadata.xml thanks!
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/03/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 02/03/2013 12:46 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/augeas app-admin/puppet dev-ml/ocaml-augeas dev-python/python-augeas dev-ruby/facter dev-ruby/hiera taking these :D Also, if anyone else wants to help me with these it would be appreciated. -- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) Afaik they are already in the sysadmin herd? I know puppet and facter at least, infra uses both. -A
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 2013-02-03 Sun 04:46, Pacho Ramos wrote: net-dns/ldns-utils net-dns/unbound net-libs/ldns I'll help maintain these. Tim pgpVlqSDEz0M6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
On 02/03/2013 09:45 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: dev-libs/boehm-gc Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. Since it's a dependency of one package I maintain (dev-lang/opendylan) I have a marginal interest in keeping it around. Feel free to add me to metadata too if I forget.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 12:44 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due tester lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/tmpreaper mine. - -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlEPV7kACgkQknrdDGLu8JDNzAD/b2/0fwNsD9pJnr82PPHUp1E8 0wq/ELBJMIk5gssxlRcA/ivb2vdEwFzjo1ptXmBAe+P9D7NC5RsO8AVfax0xd0hD =kJ6I -END PGP SIGNATURE-
