Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote: Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin - this package is special, it's maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to maintainer-needed instead of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne So 1. prosince 2012 06:42:13, Rich Freeman napsal(a): On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote: Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin - this package is special, it's maintained by a proxy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote: Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do the audit? We don't require security audits for packages to be in portage. Any package can have a security problem, whether it is in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb: Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do the audit? Also other teams actively work on the unbundling, while there is track of no will to actually make it buildable with system libs. Also the security is not the only problem here,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-11-30 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin - this package is special, it's maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to maintainer-needed instead of proxy-maint herd. Was reviewing to reassign it when I saw: